I hear by retract my objections.
Thanks for the civility to my misplaced concern.
Years in CONS,
Mark
Sent from my iPad
> On 18 Nov 2016, at 16:50, Faré wrote:
>
> Yes, supported: Having #p"foo.asd" define systems "foo/test",
> "foo/bar", "foo/baz" in addition to "foo". ASDF can even find the
Yes, supported: Having #p"foo.asd" define systems "foo/test",
"foo/bar", "foo/baz" in addition to "foo". ASDF can even find them if
you (asdf:make :foo/test) without having loaded foo first.
Unsupported: Having #p"foo.asd" define "foo-test", "bar",
"foo-unparsable-mess_with.angry^#$*characters", e
I don't read fare's email as forbidding secondary systems, just those that are
misnamed. So I don't think he's proposing to remove features, just check
compliance with the naming convention.
Maybe the proposal at hand is not described crisply enough.
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 18, 2016, at 07
> On 18 Nov 2016, at 14:40, Faré wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Mark Evenson wrote:
>>> I'd like to forbid such misnamed systems.
>>> Now a quick grepping through Quicklisp (see latest update to my ql-test)
>>> finds 233 .asd files with such misnamed secondary systems.
>>> Obviousl
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Mark Evenson wrote:
>> I'd like to forbid such misnamed systems.
>> Now a quick grepping through Quicklisp (see latest update to my ql-test)
>> finds 233 .asd files with such misnamed secondary systems.
>> Obviously it will take time to clean up the mess,
>> so for
> On 18 Nov 2016, at 14:19, Faré wrote:
>
> Starting with ASDF 3 (2013), ASDF officially supports "secondary systems",
> i.e. additional systems named in an asd, beside the main one.
> For the additional systems to be findable by ASDF, though, their name
> must be of the form "foo/bar" where "fo
