Re: Pending Merge Requests

2016-12-12 Thread Faré
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: >> This is a long-standing bug in ASDF misusing using ECL's builder. ECL >> now will sanitize it in builder, so if its not merged, building in ASDF >> may fail with an error in some cases (instead of producing not working >> binary). Note that

Re: Pending Merge Requests

2016-12-12 Thread Robert Goldman
On 12/12/16 Dec 12 -1:36 PM, Daniel Kochmański wrote: > > Robert Goldman writes: > >> Currently pending for 3.2.0: >> >> !59 >> Link objects only > > This is a long-standing bug in ASDF misusing using ECL's builder. ECL > now will sanitize it in builder, so if its not merged, building in ASDF >

Re: Pending Merge Requests

2016-12-12 Thread Daniel Kochmański
Robert Goldman writes: > Currently pending for 3.2.0: > > !59 > Link objects only This is a long-standing bug in ASDF misusing using ECL's builder. ECL now will sanitize it in builder, so if its not merged, building in ASDF may fail with an error in some cases (instead of producing not working b

Re: Pending Merge Requests

2016-12-12 Thread Robert Goldman
On 12/12/16 Dec 12 -1:11 PM, Faré wrote: > If we can have only one of these changes in, I'd like !59, because it > fixes bundles on ECL on platforms that can't link libraries from > libraries (is that what makes it fail on Mac?). It's not a regression, > though, so unless Daniel K says it's urgent

Re: Pending Merge Requests

2016-12-12 Thread Faré
If we can have only one of these changes in, I'd like !59, because it fixes bundles on ECL on platforms that can't link libraries from libraries (is that what makes it fail on Mac?). It's not a regression, though, so unless Daniel K says it's urgent we can wait for the next release. !60 is a bug f