> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Florian Margaine wrote:
> > After speaking a bit with jackdaniel on irc, it seems that the issue is
> > correctly writing the .a files? If so, since it's a simple ar archive, this
> > could be done in Lisp. I wrote an ar writer in less than
I've mistakenly taken this thread as one on the ecl-devel - please
ignore direct ECL references.
Regards,
Daniel
Daniel Kochmański writes:
> Faré writes:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Daniel Kochmański
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Faré writes:
>>>
Difficulties making
Hi,
After speaking a bit with jackdaniel on irc, it seems that the issue is
correctly writing the .a files? If so, since it's a simple ar archive, this
could be done in Lisp. I wrote an ar writer in less than 100 lines with
some hard coded values:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Florian Margaine wrote:
> After speaking a bit with jackdaniel on irc, it seems that the issue is
> correctly writing the .a files? If so, since it's a simple ar archive, this
> could be done in Lisp. I wrote an ar writer in less than 100
Faré writes:
> Difficulties making monolithic-lib-op portable suggest that it (and
> maybe also lib-op) should output an object file as if by ld -r rather
> than a static library. Indeed, there is no *portable* way to combine
> several .a files into a single one on a BSD system (including MacOS
Faré writes:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Daniel Kochmański
> wrote:
>>
>> Faré writes:
>>
>>> Difficulties making monolithic-lib-op portable suggest that it (and
>>> maybe also lib-op) should output an object file as if by ld -r rather
>>> than a static library.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
>
> Faré writes:
>
>> Difficulties making monolithic-lib-op portable suggest that it (and
>> maybe also lib-op) should output an object file as if by ld -r rather
>> than a static library. Indeed, there is no