Re: package pollution by asdf

2018-01-16 Thread Robert Goldman
On 16 Jan 2018, at 10:46, Sam Steingold wrote: Hi, When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and 37 of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*). I wonder if I am the only one

Re: package pollution by asdf

2018-01-16 Thread Pascal Bourguignon
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 17:46, Sam Steingold wrote: > > Hi, > > When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all > possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and 37 > of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*). > > I

package pollution by asdf

2018-01-16 Thread Sam Steingold
Hi, When I start CLISP with the full linking set (i.e., including all possible extensions), I have 63 packages in (list-all-packages), and 37 of them (more than half!) comes from asdf (22 ASDF/* and 15 UIOP/*). I wonder if I am the only one unhappy about this. In particular, has it ever been