I submit that Gary is currently the only person with a vote that
counts: he's doing the actual work on ASDF at the moment. If using
bug-tracker X makes his life easier, it's good. If it doesn't, it's
bad.
That said, _a_ bug-tracker would be good.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
I submit that Gary is currently the only person with a vote that
counts: he's doing the actual work on ASDF at the moment. If using
bug-tracker X makes his life easier, it's good. If it doesn't, it's
bad.
That said, _a_ bug-tracker would be good.
Stellian has set
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC.
test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script
test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are
Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp.
Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem
The cCLan list has apparently become the asdf-devel list.
Is this still where the upstream for split-sequence is? If so, can
this patch be applied? If not, who's in charge?
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | ReflectionCybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Politics is made up of two words, Poli, which
