Re: [asdf-devel] What is the release process for ASDF?

2009-11-30 Thread Robert P. Goldman
I'll try to run the tests on ACL and could probably do CCL as well. Give me a head's up when you're ready... On Nov 30, 2009, at 22:15, Faré wrote: > Beside running tests with SBCL, what is the release process for ASDF? > > Are there a script to automatically increase the revision number, > com

[asdf-devel] What is the release process for ASDF?

2009-11-30 Thread Faré
Beside running tests with SBCL, what is the release process for ASDF? Are there a script to automatically increase the revision number, commit, build tarballs, update online documentation? The bin/ directory suggests there are, but it's unclear what is the correct usage pattern (if any), and I'd

[asdf-devel] Please test: merged ECL support, created asdf.asd

2009-11-30 Thread Faré
Dear ASDF developers, I've committed to *a new repo* a few ASDF hacks that I wrote. I'd like some of you to review and/or test it. I'd like to get it reviewed before I push those changes to the official repo. git clone http://common-lisp.net/project/xcvb/git/asdf.git cd asdf git diff -u -a -b 1f7

Re: [asdf-devel] Bizarre consequences of FIND-SYSTEM in ASDF.

2009-11-30 Thread dherring
Robert Goldman wrote: > Daniel Herring wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Robert Goldman wrote: >>> I'm actually surprised to see that cl-utilities wants to load the swank >>> asdf definition, too >> >> It was McCLIM that wanted swank (IIRC for a simple IDE). Cl-utilities >> requires sb-rotate-byt

Re: [asdf-devel] Bizarre consequences of FIND-SYSTEM in ASDF.

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Goldman
dherr...@tentpost.com wrote: > Robert Goldman wrote: >> Daniel Herring wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Robert Goldman wrote: > > There would be several benefits if FIND-SYSTEM were to simply PROBE-FILE > for a system definition in each of the configured paths (e.g. > path1/system.asd, path2/s

Re: [asdf-devel] Bizarre consequences of FIND-SYSTEM in ASDF.

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Goldman
Daniel Herring wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Robert Goldman wrote: > >> Can you explain how you got hold of McCLIM and CL-Utilities? I'd be >> interested in seeing if I can replicate this, but I haven't used McCLIM >> in years, and back in those dark days we used only CVS (and we walked to >> sch

Re: [asdf-devel] Output Stream for ASDF

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Goldman
Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote: > Thomas Bartscher writes: > >> Why are warnings of asdf put into *standard-output*? >> Wouldn't it be easier to put those into something like *asdf-warnigs*? This >> way >> users of asdf could redirect those wherever they want. > > That's a pet peeve of RPG, in fact