Sorry, I haven't touched it for a while. Is this causing a problem? For
what projects? The actual cl-glfw-opengl system is probably a lot less used
than cl-glfw.
As I recall I think it's because there are two packages that can provide
those named functions, the ARB extensions for older version of
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes:
On the one hand, I am deprecating component-property in ASDF3,
Why? What will be the new mechanism for what component-property
provides?
Zach
___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes:
On the one hand, I am deprecating component-property in ASDF3,
Why? What will be the new mechanism for what component-property
provides?
I propose that any data that component-property is actually used for
should be in appropriate slots of the system.
This
I'm still curious as to _why_ component property is going away, not (just) how
you think folks should work around its absence.
thanks,
Cyrus
On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote:
On the one hand, I am deprecating component-property in ASDF3,
Why? What will be the new
On the one hand, I am deprecating component-property in ASDF3,
Why? What will be the new mechanism for what component-property
provides?
I propose that any data that component-property is actually used for
should be in appropriate slots of the system.
This will introduce a new round of
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes:
On the one hand, I am deprecating component-property in ASDF3,
Why? What will be the new mechanism for what component-property
provides?
I propose that any data that component-property is actually used for
should be in appropriate slots of the system.
This
Synchronization is NOT necessary to add new slots.
If you want a new slot, just create a new class with that slot,
and use both :defsystem-depends-on and :class in your defsystem form.
This usage pattern wouldn't work on ASDF 1 or early ASDF 2, but
it works quite well since ASDF 2.016 from
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes:
Feel free to adopt this technique for your proposed website slot, so it
does not cause compatibility problems. Please do not remove other
techniques.
There is no compatibility problem whatsoever with adding optional slots.
I just tried, and got this:
Error
Dear all,
is anyone of you using any of these functions from ASDF, ASDF-UTILS or
XCVB-DRIVER ?
I've removed them and here are the alternatives I am using.
Since previous code didn't have any numbered release API,
I will only provide compatibility trampolines if there is a declared user base.
Feel free to adopt this technique for your proposed website slot, so it
does not cause compatibility problems. Please do not remove other
techniques.
There is no compatibility problem whatsoever with adding optional slots.
I just tried, and got this:
Error while trying to load
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes:
I haven't added the slots yet, so of course it won't work.
As for disabling properties on old versions of ASDF that don't
actually support them,
that's what #+asdf3 is for, just like #+asdf2 before it.
When it is time to add support for a bug-tracker-url slot,
I did an analysis of how system properties are used in Quicklisp systems,
and this suggests that the following initargs be added:
:website-url === widely requested. the URL suffix makes it less ambiguous.
:bug-tracker-url === Zach's request that makes a *whole* lot of sense
:development-email ===
In 2.26.174, I added the following initargs to system with system-FOO accessors.
I also added an :initform nil to all those optional metadata slots and
previous ones.
:long-name Another System Definition Facility
:website-url http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/;
:bug-tracker-url
Dear Red,
as a follow up to my previous email, I eventually added in 2.26.174
the following initargs to defclass system, with system-FOO accessors.
:long-name Another System Definition Facility
:website-url http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/;
:bug-tracker-url
(Replying in public to this private email; I hope this is not a faux-pas.)
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Daniel Herring dherr...@tentpost.com wrote:
:long-name Another System Definition Facility
:website-url http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/;
:bug-tracker-url
15 matches
Mail list logo
