Re: [Asdf-devel] startup times and initialize-source-registry

2014-08-21 Thread Mark Evenson
On 21 Aug 2014, at 02:36, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: […] The trick here is in this new stop-at-asd flag, which here defaults to t and isn't configurable, but which should default to nil and be configurable, for backward compatibility. Its effect is that recursing into subdirectories

Re: [Asdf-devel] startup times and initialize-source-registry

2014-08-21 Thread Faré
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Mark Evenson even...@panix.com wrote: On 21 Aug 2014, at 02:36, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: […] The trick here is in this new stop-at-asd flag, which here defaults to t and isn't configurable, but which should default to nil and be configurable, for

Re: [Asdf-devel] startup times and initialize-source-registry

2014-08-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
If I understand correctly, the proposal is to require configuration only for the special case of wanting faster start up, and absent that, configuration will be as before, since optimization for scripting is the exceptional case. That seems like a benign modification. I'd accept such a patch

Re: [Asdf-devel] startup times and initialize-source-registry

2014-08-21 Thread Faré
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.net wrote: If I understand correctly, the proposal is to require configuration only for the special case of wanting faster start up, and absent that, configuration will be as before, since optimization for scripting is the