On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Mark Evenson wrote:
> In spite of Faré's resistance to supporting LOGICAL-PATHNAMEs in ASDF, I
> would ask for help in using the current capabilities documented for
> ASDF-3.2.
>
Well, ASDF already does heroics to keep logical-pathnames working, and
we accept reas
In spite of Faré's resistance to supporting LOGICAL-PATHNAMEs in ASDF, I
would ask for help in using the current capabilities documented for
ASDF-3.2.
To wit, I would like to implement my own OUTPUT-TRANSLATIONS for
LOGICAL-PATHNAMES [as is allowed (but discouraged)][1].
[1]:
https://www.common-l
