Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > Thank you very much, Anton. Question: is the inner-conditional-test failure > on SBCL 1.3.21 not a regression? I just loaded this system and tested it on > my mac with SBCL 1.4.3, and it worked fine, so I'm inclined to

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

Thank you very much, Anton. Question: is the inner-conditional-test failure on SBCL 1.3.21 not a regression? I just loaded this system and tested it on my mac with SBCL 1.4.3, and it worked fine, so I'm inclined to treat this is not a problem. Also, the inner conditional system has a readme

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

Yez, it is 3.3.1.717.03.2018, 17:38, "Robert P. Goldman" :Sorry. That was meant to be "master," not matter.Sent from my iPad On Mar 17, 2018, at 09:36, Robert P. Goldman wrote: Just to be clear: this is matter, right? It's not one of the syntax control

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

Sorry. That was meant to be "master," not matter. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 17, 2018, at 09:36, Robert P. Goldman wrote: > > Just to be clear: this is matter, right? It's not one of the syntax control > branches? > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Mar 17, 2018, at 07:51,

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

Just to be clear: this is matter, right? It's not one of the syntax control branches? Sent from my iPad > On Mar 17, 2018, at 07:51, Anton Vodonosov wrote: > > Results for these lisps: > > abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86 > ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86 >

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

Results for these lisps: abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86 ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86 ccl-1.11-r16635-f96-linux-x86 ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86 clisp-2.49-unix-x86 ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-bytecode ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-lisp-to-c sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86 sbcl-1.3.21-linux-x86 show no