Re: bootstrapping asdf

2018-08-05 Thread Faré
> I think we should probably clear out all the MRs except the syntax > rationalization, then release bug fix 3.3.3, and then move to get the syntax > branch integrated as a release candidate for 3.4. > > I think the syntax isolation is a big enough change in behavior that it > merits being 3.4

Re: Is anyone actually using the deferred warnings code?

2018-08-05 Thread Faré
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM Robert Goldman wrote: > > AFAICT, it is disabled by default, and it is not documented in the ASDF > manual. > > So is this code even live, except for in the test scripts? > > It was pretty painful to get this to work because it relies on unexported > (and hence

Re: bootstrapping asdf

2018-08-05 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5 Aug 2018, at 17:31, Faré wrote: In case anyone takes over maintenance of ASDF in the future, I wrote this mind dump on some of its more stuble "magic" behavior: https://fare.livejournal.com/190738.html Thanks to Eric Timmons for the prompting... PS: there are relatedly a few bug fixes in

bootstrapping asdf

2018-08-05 Thread Faré
In case anyone takes over maintenance of ASDF in the future, I wrote this mind dump on some of its more stuble "magic" behavior: https://fare.livejournal.com/190738.html Thanks to Eric Timmons for the prompting... PS: there are relatedly a few bug fixes in 3.3.2.5 — thanks and congratulations