> Gary King wrote:
>> I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to
>> support
>> these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc... (?)).
I will do this.
>>
>> I'm going to update the manual with James's table (thanks James!)
>> in the
>> hopes of giving us a pl
On 2009-07-21, at 01:39 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> james anderson wrote:
>> On 2009-07-21, at 00:58 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>>
>>> Gary King wrote:
I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to
support
these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc... (
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-07-21, at 01:18 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> james anderson wrote:
>>> On 2009-07-21, at 00:35 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> [...]
What would it mean, for
example, to be :contingent-on or :weakly-depend on a :file?
>>> if the file is present, then the cont
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-07-21, at 00:58 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> Gary King wrote:
>>> I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to
>>> support
>>> these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc... (?)).
>>>
>>> I'm going to update the manual with James'
On 2009-07-21, at 01:18 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> james anderson wrote:
>> On 2009-07-21, at 00:35 , Robert Goldman wrote:
[...]
>>
>>> What would it mean, for
>>> example, to be :contingent-on or :weakly-depend on a :file?
>>
>> if the file is present, then the contingent component is includ
On 2009-07-21, at 00:58 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> Gary King wrote:
>> I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to
>> support
>> these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc... (?)).
>>
>> I'm going to update the manual with James's table (thanks James!)
>> in
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-07-21, at 00:35 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> james anderson wrote:
>>> On 2009-07-20, at 21:10 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>>>
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-18, at 14:55 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>
>> 2009/5/18 Robert Goldman :
>>> Tobias C. R
On 2009-07-21, at 00:35 , Robert Goldman wrote:
> james anderson wrote:
>>
>> On 2009-07-20, at 21:10 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>>
>>> james anderson wrote:
On 2009-05-18, at 14:55 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> 2009/5/18 Robert Goldman :
>> Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>>> I've
Gary King wrote:
> I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to support
> these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc... (?)).
>
> I'm going to update the manual with James's table (thanks James!) in the
> hopes of giving us a place to hang our collective hats.
>
I share Robert's queasiness and also think that we want ASDF to
support these sorts of dependencies (simple, weak, contingent, etc...
(?)).
I'm going to update the manual with James's table (thanks James!) in
the hopes of giving us a place to hang our collective hats.
james anderson wrote:
>
> On 2009-07-20, at 21:10 , Robert Goldman wrote:
>
>> james anderson wrote:
>>> On 2009-05-18, at 14:55 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>>>
2009/5/18 Robert Goldman :
> Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
>> I've read several times that it's a head ache to configure optio
On 2009-07-20, at 21:10 , Robert Goldman wrote:
james anderson wrote:
On 2009-05-18, at 14:55 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
2009/5/18 Robert Goldman :
Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
I've read several times that it's a head ache to configure
optional
dependencies with ASDF.
How true is that? C
james anderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-18, at 14:55 , Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>
>> 2009/5/18 Robert Goldman :
>>> Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
I've read several times that it's a head ache to configure optional
dependencies with ASDF.
How true is that? Could we perhaps provide anot
Gary King writes:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I'm forwarding this to the asdf-devel list and will answer it later
> today from there.
Please send a copy to the cclan list. I just submitted asdf-devel to
gmane.org but it usually takes some time because the newsgroups are
created manually.
-T.
--
Diese
14 matches
Mail list logo
