On 2010-02-03, at 11:41 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> I believe that this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/asdf/+bug/502946
>
> probably you should subscribe to this bug.
Thanks Robert, this is indeed the bug I'm experiencing.
Regards,
- Scott
___
asdf-d
On 2/3/10 Feb 3 -11:53 AM, Faré wrote:
> On 3 February 2010 11:32, Scott Bell wrote:
>> (:group "x"
>> :depends-on ("packages")
> If you're not in a subdirectory #p"x/", here add a
> :pathname #p""
>> :components
>> ((:file "a")
>>(:file "b" :depends-on
On 2/3/10 Feb 3 -10:32 AM, Scott Bell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Recently, in order to increase the modularity of our project's ASDF
> dependencies, I introduced a sub-class of MODULE called GROUP.
> We wanted to keep all of our main .lisp files in the toplevel, so the
> purpose of the class is simply
On 3 February 2010 11:32, Scott Bell wrote:
> (:group "x"
> :depends-on ("packages")
If you're not in a subdirectory #p"x/", here add a
:pathname #p""
> :components
> ((:file "a")
> (:file "b" :depends-on ("a"))
> (:file "c" :depends-on ("b"))
Hi folks,
Recently, in order to increase the modularity of our project's ASDF
dependencies, I introduced a sub-class of MODULE called GROUP.
We wanted to keep all of our main .lisp files in the toplevel, so the
purpose of the class is simply to define a method for the
COMPONENT-RELATIVE_PATHNAME g
