Faré wrote:
> On the other hand, if there's no way to enforce it, then it will
> constantly diverge, so the policy becomes annoying.
I've been meaning to work on this...
- Daniel
___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-li
So... is anyone against my committing a release that just untabifies
all our Lisp files?
Speak up now, or remain silent forever.
On the other hand, if there's no way to enforce it, then it will
constantly diverge, so the policy becomes annoying.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethi
IMO ASDF should be untabified, and there should be no trailing whitespace.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
___
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
I'd like such a filter applied to each and every text file, currently
excluding only the *.ico and *.png.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Ever stop thinking and forget to start again?
2009/12/3 Robert P. Goldman :
> Only .lisp and .asd sounds suffic
Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
> "Tobias C. Rittweiler" writes:
>
>> I can recommend to put the following into your .emacs
>>
>> (add-hook 'lisp-mode-hook
>> #'(lambda ()
>> (setq whitespace-style 'color)
>> (setq whitespace-chars '(trailing indentation))
Only .lisp and .asd sounds sufficient to me, but Gary wrote a lot of
shell scripts I haven't really looked at. I don't have a strong
opinion about the documentation source (perhaps surprisingly).
Best,
R
On Dec 2, 2009, at 20:54, Daniel Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Faré wrote:
>
>>
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" writes:
> I can recommend to put the following into your .emacs
>
> (add-hook 'lisp-mode-hook
> #'(lambda ()
> (setq whitespace-style 'color)
> (setq whitespace-chars '(trailing indentation))
> (whitespace-mode 1)
Daniel Herring
writes:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Faré wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/2 Robert Goldman :
>>> I should actually have been specific about something else:
>>>
>>> If we prefer spaces to tabs (and I will not attempt to stack my
>>> eloquence and vituperation against jwz's), we should probably stick t
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Faré wrote:
2009/12/2 Robert Goldman :
I should actually have been specific about something else:
If we prefer spaces to tabs (and I will not attempt to stack my
eloquence and vituperation against jwz's), we should probably stick the
git-equivalent of a pre-commit-hook into
2009/12/2 Robert Goldman :
> I should actually have been specific about something else:
>
> If we prefer spaces to tabs (and I will not attempt to stack my
> eloquence and vituperation against jwz's), we should probably stick the
> git-equivalent of a pre-commit-hook into the repo to refuse to acce
I should actually have been specific about something else:
If we prefer spaces to tabs (and I will not attempt to stack my
eloquence and vituperation against jwz's), we should probably stick the
git-equivalent of a pre-commit-hook into the repo to refuse to accept tabs.
Daniel --- is your git fu
> I would just be tickled to death if we were to ban tab characters from
> asdf code (I'm convinced by jwz's argument, and I've been harmed enough
> times by Windows-versus-others tab issues), but I'd be ok with keeping
> them.
>
> Do we have a consensus on tabs-versus-spaces?
For general prefix i
I would just be tickled to death if we were to ban tab characters from
asdf code (I'm convinced by jwz's argument, and I've been harmed enough
times by Windows-versus-others tab issues), but I'd be ok with keeping them.
Do we have a consensus on tabs-versus-spaces?
Cheerio,
r
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
