On 1 Mar 2018, at 10:47, Eric Timmons wrote:
> MR sent. I took the approach of setting the source-file. The etypecase
> approach would have either introduced a circular dependency between
> system.lisp and package-inferred-system.lisp or would have required
> the package-inferred-system symbol to
MR sent. I took the approach of setting the source-file. The etypecase
approach would have either introduced a circular dependency between
system.lisp and package-inferred-system.lisp or would have required
the package-inferred-system symbol to be exported from system.lisp
which felt wrong.
-Eric
Dear Eric, Robert,
>:Eric
> If a have a package-inferred-systems "a" and "a/b/c", the following
> code used to return "a":
>
> (primary-system-name (find-system "a/b/c"))
>
> But after commit 069cd2a6 it returns nil.
>
Thanks for finding that bug. Sorry we didn't have regression tests for that.
>
On 28 Feb 2018, at 15:46, Eric Timmons wrote:
If a have a package-inferred-systems "a" and "a/b/c", the following
code used to return "a":
(primary-system-name (find-system "a/b/c"))
But after commit 069cd2a6 it returns nil.
Happy to patch it, but I wanted to check how to do it before startin
If a have a package-inferred-systems "a" and "a/b/c", the following
code used to return "a":
(primary-system-name (find-system "a/b/c"))
But after commit 069cd2a6 it returns nil.
Happy to patch it, but I wanted to check how to do it before starting.
The root cause right now is that system-source
