[asdf-devel] asdf with-compilation-unit

2011-12-13 Thread Mark H. David
Is there any way to have ASDF compile several files with with-compilation-unit wrapped around the compilation? ___ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Re: [asdf-devel] asdf with-compilation-unit

2011-12-13 Thread Mark H. David
(load (compile-file a.lisp) (with-compilation-unit () (load (compile-file b.lisp)) (load (compile-file c.lisp))) (load (compile-file d.lisp)) Thanks. On 12/13/2011 11:28 AM, Robert Goldman wrote: On 12/13/11 Dec 13 -10:23 AM, Mark H. David wrote: Thanks, would like to do

Re: [asdf-devel] asdf with-compilation-unit

2011-12-13 Thread Mark H. David
Hi. I'd like the compilation of all the files in the unit to happen when any of the files in the unit need compilation. Then, when they're all compiled, I'd like with-compilation-unit wrapped around their compilation. I guess I want the option to do ':override true', or have that be the

Re: Finding depended-upon systems

2015-11-18 Thread Mark H. David
I strongly agree. > On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > > Maybe we should wrap this up and provide it as part of an ASDF query API?

Best Practice for an ASDF Variable Like *compile-file-failure-behaviour*

2018-03-09 Thread Mark H. David
As has been discussed here over the years, asdf:*compile-file-failure-behaviour* is :warn on most platforms, but it is notoriously :error on #+sbcl. So what would you do if you wanted to change asdf:*compile-file-failure-behaviour* to be :warn on #+SBCL? How would you recommend to change it.

Re: Best Practice for an ASDF Variable Like *compile-file-failure-behaviour*

2018-03-09 Thread Mark H. David
No, it's what we want for our system. We want everyone who builds our system to get this behavior reliably. - Original message - From: Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> To: "Mark H. David" <m...@yv.org> Cc: "ASDF-devel" <asdf-devel@common-l

Re: Best Practice for an ASDF Variable Like *compile-file-failure-behaviour*

2018-03-09 Thread Mark H. David
-warnings- > behaviour*)> > (on-failure *compile-file-failure- > behaviour*)) Could someone please ELI5 how to hook into that for on-failure? Thanks, Mark - Original message - From: Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info

why does ASDF ask to please only define system/test?

2018-12-11 Thread Mark H. David
It seems that any system Y associated with a name X must have its name be of the form X/Y. For example, when you build "cl-ppcre", you get this warning: Please only define "cl-ppcre" and secondary systems with a name starting with "cl-ppcre/" (e.g. "cl-ppcre/test") in that file. I've seen

Re: long-description

2019-02-20 Thread Mark H. David
Sounds good to me, but I'm possibly also an old-school code bummer. - Original message - From: "Faré" To: ASDF-devel , Eitarow Fukamachi , Didier Verna Subject: long-description Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 8:16 PM I've seen the pattern of using :long-description