Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Didier Verna
"Robert Goldman" écrivait: > This is yet another problem that comes from the fact that the build > plans are linear, instead of hierarchical -- for example there's no > subsequence that is identifiable as being the set of operations for a > particular module. > > Logically speaking, there's a

Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5 Dec 2018, at 10:04, Didier Verna wrote: "Robert Goldman" écrivait: Depending on the host lisp you are using, couldn't you wrap the calls to COMPILE-FILE and LOAD in code that times those operation? I could, but since I want per-library numbers, I would need to reconstruct that

Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Didier Verna
"Robert Goldman" écrivait: > Depending on the host lisp you are using, couldn't you wrap the calls > to COMPILE-FILE and LOAD in code that times those operation? I could, but since I want per-library numbers, I would need to reconstruct that information afterwards... -- Resistance is

Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Robert Goldman
On 5 Dec 2018, at 9:46, Didier Verna wrote: François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait: Simplest method: 1- load the dependencies, possibly using (asdf:operate :prepare-op s) 2- (time (asdf:make s)) Nice, thank you. If I want to time separately the compilation and loading phases of several

Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Didier Verna
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait: > Simplest method: > 1- load the dependencies, possibly using (asdf:operate :prepare-op s) > 2- (time (asdf:make s)) Nice, thank you. If I want to time separately the compilation and loading phases of several libraries (which may depend on each other)

Re: Timing compilation

2018-12-05 Thread Faré
> Hello, > > I would like to collect information about the time it takes to compile > an ASDF system (possibly also load it), dependencies excluded. I'm > thinking there's probably a way to do this by :around'ing compile-op, or > something like that, but if someone already has a clear view on