Re: Version 3.1.7.35 has been pushed

I think we wait for iolib, but probably not ASDF system connections. Its github site shows no commits for four years, so that might be a long wait Sent from my iPad > On Nov 16, 2016, at 23:49, Faré wrote: > > I sent these pull requests to fix the issues: >

Re: Version 3.1.7.35 has been pushed

> I think we wait for iolib, but probably not ASDF system connections. Its > github site shows no commits for four years, so that might be a long wait IOlib fixed. I'll make a new release next week. -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

test-run-program.script

I see this in test-run-program: #+(and sbcl os-windows) (leave-test "SBCL won't let us pass unquoted arguments to cmd.exe" 0) #-(and sbcl os-windows) (progn (DBG "Testing echo ok 1 via run-program as a string") (assert-equal "ok 1" (dewindowize (run-program "echo ok 1" :output

Re: 3.1.7.35 test status

> On 17 Nov 2016, at 19:55, Robert Goldman wrote: > > I show 3.1.7.35 passing all tests on Mac and Linux, failing test-require > and test-run-program on ECL bytecodes on Windows. > > test-require is a long-standing ECL bug on Windows that Jason Miller has > confirmed.

Re: 3.1.7.35 test status

On 11/17/16 Nov 17 -1:21 PM, Elias Pipping wrote: > >> On 17 Nov 2016, at 19:55, Robert Goldman >> wrote: >> >> I show 3.1.7.35 passing all tests on Mac and Linux, failing >> test-require and test-run-program on ECL bytecodes on Windows. >> >> test-require is a

3.1.7.35 test status

I show 3.1.7.35 passing all tests on Mac and Linux, failing test-require and test-run-program on ECL bytecodes on Windows. test-require is a long-standing ECL bug on Windows that Jason Miller has confirmed. There's a bug report in to ECL, so we don't have to worry about this. test-run-program

Re: test-run-program.script

I believe the correct workaround to the unavoidable quoting on SBCL would be to use CMD /C /S which should remove one layer of quoting. But I'm not sure I have time to setup a Windows development environment at this point (I managed to install a Windows dual boot on my computer, though! Is there

Incremental defsystem dependencies

Dear Stelian, Dear Lispers, in Gitlab MR !37 I try to address some fundamental bugs regarding the proper treatment of incrementality for defsystem dependencies. See for instance the test I just added, that still fails at this time, test-defsystem-depends-on-change.script.

Re: test-run-program.script

> On 17 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Faré wrote: > > I believe the correct workaround to the unavoidable quoting on SBCL would be > to use CMD /C /S which should remove one layer of quoting. > > But I'm not sure I have time to setup a Windows development environment at > this point

Re: test-run-program.script

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Elias Pipping wrote: > >> On 17 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Faré wrote: >> >> I believe the correct workaround to the unavoidable quoting on SBCL would be >> to use CMD /C /S which should remove one layer of quoting. >> >> But