Issues with package location information on SBCL

2018-02-16 Thread Eric Timmons
I've started testing ASDF 3.3.1.3 with my group's code on SBCL 1.4.4 and noticed some issues with uiop:define-package (due to commit 8281e011). First, when compiling ASDF I get 456 compilation notes (https://pastebin.com/NnRUKGWe). I get the same notes when using uiop:define-package in our code

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

2018-02-16 Thread Robert Goldman
Thanks for sending that. Had a quick look. One nice thing is that there's a very limited number of regressions. I'll look at those when I can. Faré: I didn't believe it was possible to downgrade ASDF, but we see this here in a couple of cases for ECL. ECL is trying to reload

Re: Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

2018-02-16 Thread Faré
Anton, thanks a lot for the test! asdf 3.3.1.3 looks good to go. Robert, I had no trouble loading clws or lime with clisp, cl-rrt or cl-sat.minisat.test or inner-conditional-test with sbcl (using asdf 3.3.1.3 from master). The ecl failures I could reproduce, but I'm not worried, as