Re: Is anyone actually using the deferred warnings code?

2018-08-05 Thread Faré
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:01 PM Robert Goldman wrote: > > AFAICT, it is disabled by default, and it is not documented in the ASDF > manual. > > So is this code even live, except for in the test scripts? > > It was pretty painful to get this to work because it relies on unexported > (and hence

Re: Is anyone actually using the deferred warnings code?

2018-05-30 Thread Robert Goldman
On 30 May 2018, at 17:28, Stelian Ionescu wrote: I used to use it, then it broke months ago on my local setup so I just disabled it. Two questions: 1. I'm curious about why you used it. Anything you could share would be helpful. 2. Was the breakage due to the change in the compiler

Re: Is anyone actually using the deferred warnings code?

2018-05-30 Thread Stelian Ionescu
I used to use it, then it broke months ago on my local setup so I just disabled it. > > AFAICT, it is disabled by default, and it is not documented in the > ASDF manual.> So is this code even live, except for in the test scripts? > It was pretty painful to get this to work because it relies on

Is anyone actually using the deferred warnings code?

2018-05-30 Thread Robert Goldman
AFAICT, it is disabled by default, and it is not documented in the ASDF manual. So is this code even live, except for in the test scripts? It was pretty painful to get this to work because it relies on unexported (and hence unstable) SBCL internals. My *guess* is that this was originally