Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-05-06 Thread Faré
> > > ASDF as it exists now is not capable of running anything in parallel. > Faré has an experimental project to do this, called POIU, but I > > can't speak for its status. Until very recently, SBCL was incapable of > compiling files in parallel, and still today, lots of code does > >

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-05-05 Thread zacque
Hi phoebe, > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > I'll still get the warnings (even with one new warning: "No dependency > propagating scheme specified..."): > > Perhaps it was imprecise of me to say that defining a method on > COMPONENT-DEPENDS-ON will prevent the deprecation warning. > Causing

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread zacque
(Ignore my previous email with the wrong "From:" sender field) > For some frustrating reason I can't email the asdf-devel list, so cc'ing > rpgoldman & he can forward. Noted, I'll reply to rpgoldman and cc you then (for better thread viewing?). > The various UPWARD- DOWNWARD- etc

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread Robert Goldman
On 27 Apr 2022, at 11:15, phoebe Goldman wrote: >> According to the docs, most operations inherit from self ward-operation, >> which would take the component-pathname as an input file (and might take >> others). > > I think input file sets are orthogonal to dependency direction. >

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread Robert Goldman
A quick note to point everyone at the doc fixes: https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/-/merge_requests/207 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread Robert Goldman
On 27 Apr 2022, at 10:26, Robert Goldman wrote: > Phoebe Goldman writes (but can't post): > >> I'm following the manual: "If the action of performing the operation on a >> component has >> dependencies, you must define a method on component-depends-on." > > > This is wrong; I don't know why the

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread Robert Goldman
Phoebe Goldman writes (but can't post): For some frustrating reason I can't email the asdf-devel list, so cc'ing rpgoldman & he can forward. > Why can't I subclass ASDF:OPERATION? This is unexpected since > ASDF:OPERATION is the base class for all operations. The various UPWARD- DOWNWARD- etc

Re: Define a Simple Echo-Op

2022-04-27 Thread zacque
Hi phoebe, Thanks for your thoughtful reply! > A few things. > > 1. ECHO-OP should not be selfward. SELFWARD-OPERATION is for (OPERATION > COMPONENT) pairs which depend on > (DIFFERENT-OPERATION COMPONENT) for the same COMPONENT. For example, LOAD-OP > is selfward with respect to >