I have questions about inner subtyping. Given these two type definitions:
Parent ::= SEQUENCE
{
anOptionalThing INTEGER OPTIONAL,
anotherOptionalThing INTEGER OPTIONAL,
aRequiredThing INTEGER
}
Child ::= Parent WITH COMPONENTS { ..., anOptionalThing
Paul Long wrote:
Paul,
I guess it depends on what you mean by a new type. (The term is not
actual defined in ASN.1, but is used in the introduction and in a
normal English way when talking about defining a new type from an old
one by tagging or subtyping.)
The text is clear that tagging and
Sorry, re my mention of possible unclarity in the A::=B and clauses
15.1 and 16.1, I missed the following in Annex B:
B.2.1 The underlying model is of types, as non-overlapping containers,
that contain values, with every occurrence of the ASN.1 Type construct
defining a distinct new type (see
Of John
Larmouth
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ASN.1] WITH-COMPONENTS creates new type or just
semantically constrains?
Paul Long wrote:
Paul,
I guess it depends on what you mean by a new type. (The term is not
actual defined in ASN.1
