RE: Apache::ASP Installation Issue

2008-08-19 Thread Randy
a Windows box...yes, it's probably using the system user by default. Thanks again. R -Original Message- From: Warren Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:20 PM To: Apache-ASP List Subject: Re: Apache::ASP Installation Issue Randy wrote: > > In t

Re: Apache::ASP Installation Issue

2008-08-19 Thread Warren Young
Randy wrote: In the browser, I get the asp script. That means Apache::ASP isn't even being called for the page, which is an Apache configuration problem, not a problem with Apache::ASP. (Problems with Apache::ASP or the ASP pages themselves show up as complaints in error_log.) In all of

RE: Apache::ASP Installation Issue

2008-08-19 Thread Randy
essage- From: Warren Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:44 PM To: Apache-ASP List Subject: Re: Apache::ASP Installation Issue Redirecting this back to the list. Please don't respond to me personally. I'm here to support Apache::ASP, not to supp

Re: Apache::ASP Installation Issue

2008-08-19 Thread Warren Young
Redirecting this back to the list. Please don't respond to me personally. I'm here to support Apache::ASP, not to support you in particular. :) Randy wrote: It now has Apache::ASP installed on it, but still won't run ASP scripts. What do you get in the browser? What do you get in Apache's

Re: Apache::ASP Installation Issue

2008-08-18 Thread Warren Young
Randy wrote: Any suggestions? (other than put it on a xxnix box) The common wisdom says that Windows is easier to use. In a lot of cases, this is true. This is not one of those cases. Apache::ASP is a native of *ix systems, and so it's far easier to install it there. You usually don't ha