On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:32:04PM -0800, Josh Chamas wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Nested includes don't work as you would expect (well, at least they
> >don't work as *I* expected :). Given files
> >
> >/PATH/A
> >/PATH/DIR/B
> >/PATH/DIR/C
> >
>
> I believe your goal really i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Nested includes don't work as you would expect (well, at least they
don't work as *I* expected :). Given files
/PATH/A
/PATH/DIR/B
/PATH/DIR/C
I believe your goal really is to really refactor includes elsewhere,
in which case we already have a mechanism for this. Incl
Hi,
Nested includes don't work as you would expect (well, at least they
don't work as *I* expected :). Given files
/PATH/A
/PATH/DIR/B
/PATH/DIR/C
Say file A includes "DIR/B". This works fine.
Say file B includes "C". This works fine when file B is accessed
directly, but fails when it is inc
