Re: [aspectj-users] Server slowdown

2014-10-14 Thread Anthony Mayfield
Thanks Ryan, I found out it was because some code deeper down was creating a parser each time. I think you might be right as the parser created a hashmap each time. It's very frustrating this takes over 100 times longer on the server though, the specs are quite similar between my server and

Re: [aspectj-users] Aspectj in weaving a jar file

2014-10-14 Thread mufc_fan
I have one more doubt... I am adding aspects to hadoop source code and I imported one of the package and created aspect aj file but while running I have to choose main function but it seems no class of this package have main function...What I have to do?...Plz help me... -- View this message in

Re: [aspectj-users] Aspectj in weaving a jar file

2014-10-14 Thread mufc_fan
can you share a link or any other on how to create a configuration manually...also is it mandatory to mention the main class in the configuration? -- View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Aspectj-in-weaving-a-jar-file-tp4651584p4651607.html Sent from the AspectJ -

[aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7

2014-10-14 Thread Heshan Suriyaarachchi
Hi, I have a project which is using aspectj and it is building fine with Java 1.6. When I update it to Java 1.7 I'm seeing following error. [INFO] Molva the Destroyer Aspects ... FAILURE [2.324s] [INFO] Molva The Destroyer Client SKIPPED [INFO] Molva

Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7

2014-10-14 Thread Frank Pavageau
2014-10-14 21:28 GMT+02:00 Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com: I’d recommend updating to a more recent AspectJ. Older AspectJs did have issues with making mistakes generating stack map frames. The option to use split verifier was only possible with JDK1.6 I think, with 1.7 they removed

Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7

2014-10-14 Thread Alexander Kriegisch
Yes, the default compliance level is 1.4 according to http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/compile-mojo.html#complianceLevel, even in the current plugin version 1.7 (you still use 1.5, I recommend an update there as well, not just in the AspectJ runtime). -- Alexander Kriegisch

Re: [aspectj-users] Stackmap frame errors when building the aspectj project with Java 1.7

2014-10-14 Thread Alexander Kriegisch
I forgot to mention that AspectJ Maven Plugin 1.7 automatically uses aspectjtools 1.8.2 by default, see http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/dependencies.html Am 14.10.2014 um 23:19 schrieb Alexander Kriegisch alexan...@kriegisch.name: Yes, the default compliance level is 1.4