Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ 1.9.0 released

Thanks Andy for all your hard work on this release (and all the previous ones!). Brett On 3 April 2018 at 05:55, Andy Clement wrote: > AspectJ 1.9.0 is finally released, after multiple betas and release > candidates. The README can be found here: >

Re: [aspectj-users] Missing stackmap generation for woven code

Maybe if you can post your POMs some Maven guru can help you out. On 7 October 2017 at 06:55, Eric B wrote: > I'm running into a problem with AspectJ 1.8.10, and not sure how to > resolve this. > > I have a multi-module maven build. One of my modules requires running an >

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ Maven plugin 1.9 was released and solves Eclipse problem from 1.8

Nice one Alexander. On 4 December 2016 at 21:58, Alexander Kriegisch wrote: > Hello AspectJ community. > > Intrigued by several people reporting problems importing/refreshing > Eclipse projects when using AspectJ Maven plugin 1.8 on StackOverflow and > in the plugin's

Re: [aspectj-users] Behaviours of new constructor added by AspectJ ITD

Thanks Andy, best explanation ever of Java field initialization as it relates to AspectJ. On 23/07/2013 8:15 AM, Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com wrote: Some background on Q1: public class Child { public String name = John; public Child(String desc) { } public

Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint.getArgs() in multiple aspects on same joinpoint

, Jay Roberts Seems like a natural extension of On Apr 14, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: Jay, This was asked not so long ago on the list - it should be added to a FAQ if it is not already there, and perhaps justifies a JavaDoc clarficiation. See also: http

Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint.getArgs() in multiple aspects on same joinpoint

Jay, This was asked not so long ago on the list - it should be added to a FAQ if it is not already there, and perhaps justifies a JavaDoc clarficiation. See also: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Modifying-parameters-in-more-than-one-aspect-providing-around-advice-td4650584.html

Re: [aspectj-users] Memory problem when using aspectj

Might be worth a quick test with increased perm gen space, in case you are running out: -XX:MaxPermSize=512m Best Brett On 22 January 2013 10:25, Aryenne Bradshaw aryen...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Users, This is my first time to the forum. I am really desperate for some help. I have a project

Re: [aspectj-users] context information in aspect fields

Hi, It may or may not be useful to you, but the Perf4j project[1] uses AspectJ to instrument code with stopwatches, providing generic around-method timing via an @Profiled annotation. There's also an unreleased enhancement in github which allows methods to be timed without annotating them (by

[aspectj-users] Git mirror?

Hi, I believe that the AspectJ source repository is in Eclipse CVS, and that there isn't a Git migration [1], but I also couldn't spot a Git CVS mirror [2]. Is there one, or if not could we request a mirror? Thanks Brett [1] http://git.eclipse.org/c/ [2] http://dev.eclipse.org/git/index.html

Re: [aspectj-users] Git mirror?

have to move to git in the relatively near term, so I'd probably just do that instead.  When I get a few minutes I'll kick that process off. Andy On 7 November 2011 02:30, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I believe that the AspectJ source repository is in Eclipse CVS

Re: [aspectj-users] Aspectj 1.6.12 in a maven repository

Thanks Andy. On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com wrote: :) It is the greatest, but not yet in central.  I'll do it very soon and post here when it is done. Andy On 26 October 2011 08:34, Jean-Francois Croteau jfcrot...@8d.com wrote: Can someone point me

Re: [aspectj-users] LTW fail hard/fast options (for testing)

, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When unit testing aspects and advised test/tested code (as opposed to deploy/runtime, where this option wouldn't make sense), it would be nice to be able to instruct the weaver to throw some sort of unchecked Exception or Error

[aspectj-users] LTW fail hard/fast options (for testing)

Hi, When unit testing aspects and advised test/tested code (as opposed to deploy/runtime, where this option wouldn't make sense), it would be nice to be able to instruct the weaver to throw some sort of unchecked Exception or Error if there are configuration problems with error severity or

Re: [aspectj-users] LTW fail hard/fast options (for testing)

I have now found static/inner IMessageHandler IMessageHandler.THROW, which seems to be on the right track and what I need. Do I need to reproduce this in my test code, or could we promote the THROW instance to a public class? Thanks Brett On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Brett Randall javabr

Re: [aspectj-users] 1.6.11 push to Maven Central?

repository than the central one. Andy On 15 May 2011 17:29, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 1.6.11 was final in March, but I believe that 1.6.10 is the latest available in Maven Central.  Is there a separate push step for the release and can we run it? http://search.maven.org

Re: [aspectj-users] IDE support for 'privileged' modifier

been working for some time now. I raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=345883 to track this. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: I enabled AspectJ tooling on a project in Eclipse, then I needed to create a new Aspect with 'privileged

[aspectj-users] 1.6.11 push to Maven Central?

Hi, 1.6.11 was final in March, but I believe that 1.6.10 is the latest available in Maven Central. Is there a separate push step for the release and can we run it? http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.aspectj%22%20AND%20a%3A%22aspectjrt%22 Thanks Brett

[aspectj-users] IDE support for 'privileged' modifier

I enabled AspectJ tooling on a project in Eclipse, then I needed to create a new Aspect with 'privileged' modifier. I think I notice two things: 1) Checking the 'privileged' modifier checkbox in the new aspect wizard didn't result in the privileged keyword/modifier in my new Aspect file. 2) When

Re: [aspectj-users] Setup older compiler/runtime (1.6.8, v6 attributes) in Eclipse

). Andy On 28 April 2011 20:17, Brett Randall javabr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using a current Eclipse version, so I've picked-up AspectJ/ajc1.6.11 in my development environment.  In my runtime environment I'm stuck with 1.6.8 for now, so as expected on deployment I'm seeing a v6 versus v7

[aspectj-users] Setup older compiler/runtime (1.6.8, v6 attributes) in Eclipse

Hi, I'm using a current Eclipse version, so I've picked-up AspectJ/ajc1.6.11 in my development environment.  In my runtime environment I'm stuck with 1.6.8 for now, so as expected on deployment I'm seeing a v6 versus v7 version clash, per [1]. Unfortunate, runtime is only one revision too old