Hi Andy:
Thanks a lot for your elaboration :)
--
View this message in context:
http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Behaviours-of-new-constructor-added-by-AspectJ-ITD-tp4651015p4651045.html
Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Some background on Q1:
public class Child {
public String name = John;
public Child(String desc) {
}
public Child(int bar) {
}
}
When this code is compiled the bytecode to set name to 'John' is included
in every constructor within the class (without anything to mark that
Thanks Andy, best explanation ever of Java field initialization as it
relates to AspectJ.
On 23/07/2013 8:15 AM, Andy Clement andrew.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
Some background on Q1:
public class Child {
public String name = John;
public Child(String desc) {
}
public
Hi thanks! so it seems for Q1, it's apsecJ's limitation.
Thank you for the information :)
I'll post Q2 question in another thread.
Regards!
--
View this message in context:
http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/Behaviours-of-new-constructor-added-by-AspectJ-ITD-tp4651015p4651028.html
Sent
For Q1: AspectJ compiler (and AJDT) will issue - inter-type constructor
does not contain explicit constructor call: field initializers in the
target type will not be executed
[Xlint:noExplicitConstructorCall] when you don't have explicit
constructor call.
Can you post Q2 freshly in a separate
Hi! folk~ I have a question about behaviours of new constructor added by
AspectJ ITD
I am currently applying AspectJ to our project, and I found a behavior which
is a bit strange to me.
**Q1:**
I added a new constructor to my current class with inter-type declaration,
and found that the class's
Replied on stackoverflow.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:03 AM, pai pika...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! folk~ I have a question about behaviours of new constructor added by
AspectJ ITD
I am currently applying AspectJ to our project, and I found a behavior
which
is a bit strange to me.
**Q1:**
I
Hi! thanks for the response.
But it seems you have some misunderstanding about my questions.
So I made some modifications to make it clear.
Thank you for the help :)
I am currently applying AspectJ to our project, and I found a behavior which
is a bit strange to me.
*Q1:*
I added a new
Hello.
With all due respect: Ramnivas has answered the question before on SO quite
patiently. So as not to waste any more of his precious time I recommend you to
- read his answer,
- think again, especially about Q1 and
- learn some basic Java.
Sorry if it sounds rude, but you seem not to
Hi Alex!
I'm sorry that you think I don't appreciate his answer.
But actually, I do appreciate for your kind response.
That's why I think I may not state my questions clear enough for people to
understand clearly.
It's my mistake.
It seems my questions was misunderstood.
I am quite familiar
Replied again (appended to original answer). Hopefully, this resolves your
issue.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:27 PM, pai pika...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex!
I'm sorry that you think I don't appreciate his answer.
But actually, I do appreciate for your kind response.
That's why I think I
Dear ramnivas:
Thank you for your detailed answer, but I have some follow-up questions.
As regard to your answers.
Q1:
public class Child {
public String name = John;
public Child(String desc) {
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
}
If I new the Child with its
12 matches
Mail list logo
