t regards
>
> JL Pasturel
>
> --
> *De :* aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] *De la part de* Matthew Adams
> *Envoyé :* mardi 14 décembre 2010 16:16
> *À :* aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> *Objet :* Re: [aspe
: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11
I might suggest moving the + or - sign inside the annotation to indicate the
addition or removal of the annotation's member:
declare @field: int aField: @Foo(+i=5)
That way, you can add and remove annotation
n-Louis Pasturel
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de Frank Pavageau
> Envoyé : mardi 14 décembre 2010 10:30
> À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] New featu
-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de Frank Pavageau
Envoyé : mardi 14 décembre 2010 10:30
À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11
Jean-Louis,
why would adding / replacing @Foo remove @Bar at the same time, without an
explicit -...@bar? I definitely wa
igine-
> De : aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de Andy Clement
> Envoyé : lundi 13 décembre 2010 18:57
> À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11
>
> Hi,
>
> I
8:57
À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : Re: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11
Hi,
I actually have a whiteboard covered in syntax proposals around this topic
:)
Yes, for compatibility reasons we have to maintain the existing defined
behaviour without inclusion of any special charact
Hi,
I actually have a whiteboard covered in syntax proposals around this topic :)
Yes, for compatibility reasons we have to maintain the existing
defined behaviour without inclusion of any special characters. It
will annotate the target or report an error if the target is already
annotated.
- r
I open a new thread to discuss the new feature of 1.6.11 about declare
annotation
The M1 comes with the removal of an annotation of field like specified in the
readme :
declare @field: int Foo.i: -...@anno;
It gives me an idea with the + sign as this :
declare @field: int Foo.i: +...@anno(par
