Re: [aspectj-users] Intertype declaration name mangling - for or against?

2009-11-23 Thread Matthew Adams
I'm for it as well, and would be for switching the default to nonmangled. I think the social impact of mangled names is negative, as is the fact that the fields are public, but that is another issue, https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288282. -matthew On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM,

Re: [aspectj-users] Intertype declaration name mangling - for or against?

2009-11-23 Thread Dave Whittaker
I'm wondering, is it interesting that I proposed it because it seems like it would cause me problems with all the ITDs I use, or because it just seems problematic in general? I think in my personal use cases I have ITDs with very specific behavior which is unlikely to cause many name clash