I’ve made some modifications - basically changed all the thisJoinPoint and
thisEnclosingJoinPoint code generation for all join point kinds. These are in
the 1.9.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT build available from the repository:
maven.springframework.org
http://maven.springframework.org/snapshot
or
Ok! Yes sure!
On Feb 26, 2018 20:31, "Andy Clement" wrote:
> I did do some initial exploration work and it turned out to be bigger
> impact than I’d hoped. Doesn’t mean it won’t happen - just that it’ll take
> longer. If I did get you a snapshot build with prototype code in it, would
> you be ab
I did do some initial exploration work and it turned out to be bigger impact
than I’d hoped. Doesn’t mean it won’t happen - just that it’ll take longer. If
I did get you a snapshot build with prototype code in it, would you be able to
try it out and see if it behaves in your situation?
cheers,
Any progress?
Cheers,
Fabian
2018-01-10 19:48 GMT+01:00 Andy Clement :
> The proper optimization here is to use the LDC byte code that takes a
> constant class, rather than the string variant and then class loading. The
> original AspectJ used the string form because LDC didn't take a class
> ori
The proper optimization here is to use the LDC byte code that takes a
constant class, rather than the string variant and then class loading. The
original AspectJ used the string form because LDC didn't take a class
originally. Over the years a few places have been updated but not
everywhere ( this
