I would leave the polling to you - you can choose to do that whenever you
wish.
You somehow did not seem to respond to comparing you with Mullah Omar ;-) As
per you, Assam does not need the fundamentalists today. Tomorrow you will
say Assam does not need the guys who want Assam in India.
Or
Antigen for Exchange found Hhwl.exe matching =*.exe file filter.
The file is currently Removed. The message, CELLPADDING, was
sent from monkey and was discovered in Urmi Medhi\Inbox.
Alpana,
May be you will know better.
Do they also say it in the South (say in Madras or Kerela) as if India is a
se[arate country from the South.?
I am trying to fogure out where exactly they do not say India as a separate.
Even in Punjab, they used to talk about India as a separate country, and
Dear Sir,
URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL
For introduction, my name is ENG TONY NWANNE. and a
close associate
of
CHIEF ROCHASS OKOROCHA, Former Chairman of the
Nigerian Airspace
Management Authority(NAMA)who was recently relieved of
his appointment
by the Federal Government of Nigeria because he fell
Rajen:
Xongkordev never felt that he was doing anything our=tside India whether he
was in Bordwa or in Koch Bihar. It is remarkable that even at that time the
enlightened Indians, either in Assam on the east or in Madras in south felt
the unity of Bharat Borxo. Political separation hardly
Does anty netter know anything about the following? I did read about the
Reagan Administartion's tacit approval of Iraq's using of poison gas in the
Iraq Iran war in order to stave off a massive invasion of Iraq by Iran's
human wave assaults. But this one is explosive. Never heard it before.
cm
At 9:02 AM + 9/18/02, Rajib Das wrote:
I would leave the polling to you - you can choose to do that whenever you
wish.
*** Somehow I knew what the answer would be. I bet only on sure things.
You somehow did not seem to respond to comparing you with Mullah Omar ;-)
*** I missed that.
Thus spake Alpana Sarangapani:
+ Your quandary is on WHY it is important to mention the fact that Xonkordev
+ developed the idea BEFORE he undertook the journeys to outside of Kamrup (
+ that is present day India), if the universality of his teachings is the
+ most important issue. Am
Barua: I only know one Madrasi :) very well, and he *most definitely* does
not think that India is separate from the South.
And I don't either. But i can understand when in some context, someone says
something coming from India - even though it may be logically incorrect.
I understand your
Even Mullah Omar bets on sure things (in his mind) :-)
It is good to give the intellect a solid work-out.
The shrill, shrill voices of the bleeding hearts.
From: Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rajib Das [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: From Times of India
Date: Wed,
Rajib Das said on AssamNet:
+
+ Even Mullah Omar bets on sure things (in his mind) :-)
+
+ It is good to give the intellect a solid work-out.
+
+ The shrill, shrill voices of the bleeding hearts.
+
dilip-da hasnt passed his judgement yet.
--
saurav
Dilipda is watching from the box seat. So far it is a tied game. I am enjoying the game. Have at it.
Dilipda
Saurav Pathak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Rajib Das said on AssamNet:+ + Even Mullah Omar bets on sure things (in his mind) :-)+ + "It is good to give the intellect a solid work-out."+ + The
Actually, this theory of India being Delhi, UP , Bihar probably is no longer
true.
The engines of economic growth in in the West and South - the best young
minds (from all over the country) are gravitating towards a select few
cities in those regions - much like in the pre-Independence days,
*** I see the seeds of a very important idea here that you unearthed: That
the sub-continent shared a social/cultural/religious linkage and
connections, inspite of POLITICAL divisions that ALWAYS existed. In other
words people of distinctly different cultures lived separately under
I have many questions:
Would a pro-choice point of view support selective choice in abortion? If parents
ought to have the right to choose whether or not to abort a foetus then does that
not include, in particular, the right to abort under certain circumstances including
the circumstance
even India
to you?' Really funny.It Is funny, isn't it? How people talkand
how people take it! Now Iguess we need to be "legally" (or do you
say politically?) correct, even in everyday life. In this case,
specially this looks strange, because from
youexplanation,
Shankaracharya introduce a
The problem in India is notone of pro-choice vs. anti-abortion. It has deeper social roots. The cost associated with a girl's marriage and dowry in Northern India leads to the decision of foeticide. Assam used to be free from this malaise. With this pan-indianism thing , I am not sure where Assam
BTW, I am not sure who Shankaracharya was, I
was talking about Shankardev, and what did i say, heintroduced a branch that is less practised
in India?
No, I
said: he introduced a new "sect" in Hinduism itselfas hestarted
believing in one God
andafterhe had deep discussions
with the pundits
Chandan,
I think Indian subcontinent has such strong cultural roots and connections,
that in the old times, political boundaries hardly made any difference.
Haridwar, Mathura, Brindaban, Puri, Kamakhya, Tirupati and many other places
will always remain primary goals of many Indian tourists.
19 matches
Mail list logo
