5) Regarding language, you are correct in interpreting my view: Assamese
>language is older than Bengali.
>Rajen Barua
>
>
>
>>From: "Alpana B. Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]]Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002
2:07 PMTo: Supratic Gupta;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Re: Sankardeva responsible for
indianizing Assam?
>I C, quite interesting. Let us see
what you said
I don't remember claiming myself to be
a theologist. So keep y
thing much to say.
- Original Message -
From:
Supratic
Gupta
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:02
AM
Subject: RE: Re: Sankardeva responsible
for indianizing Assam?
>BTW, I am not sure who Shankaracharya was,
I was talki
;
>To: Rajib Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:23:54 -0400
>
>
>
>
>Rajib Das said on AssamNet:
>
>+
>+ UP, Bihar have lent themselves to irrelevance - their large
seriously
thinking about it.
Second question is what good it will be politically and economically.
Rajen Barua
>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing As
>BTW, I am not sure who Shankaracharya was, I
was talking about Shankardev, and what did i say, he>introduced a branch that is less practised
in India?
>No, I
said: he introduced a new "sect" in Hinduism itself as he started
believing in one God
>and after he had deep discussions
with the
ion and twisting'? Hope nobody has failed and has
to go thru the whole process again! I am not!!
>From: "Supratic Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Subject: RE: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing
Assam?>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:5
Bhupen Hazarika once said that the three 'Ko's will always
> remain in India:
> >Kamakhya
> >Kanya Kumarica &
> >Kashmir.
> >
> >Let us hope that he is right. But only time will prove.
> >
> >Rajen Barua
> >
> >
> >>From: &q
Rajib Das said on AssamNet:
+
+ UP, Bihar have lent themselves to irrelevance - their large numbers in the
+ parliament, I believe, will soon be a problem in the federal structure of
+ the country.
what exactly do you mean by "problem in the federal
structure"?
--
saurav
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:22:54 -0500
>
>Barua: I only know one Madrasi :) very well, and he *most definitely* does
>not think that India is separate
should not work for the Assamese. But then
where would the vested interests go?
>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:
t like to give India only to Delhi and UP.
>From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:34:32 -0500
>
>Alpana,
>May be you will know better.
>Do they al
Thus spake Alpana Sarangapani:
+ > Your quandary is on WHY it is important to mention the fact that Xonkordev
+ > developed the idea BEFORE he undertook the journeys to outside of Kamrup (
+ > that is present day India), if the universality of his teachings is the
+ > most important issue.
n in India:
>Kamakhya
>Kanya Kumarica &
>Kashmir.
>
>Let us hope that he is right. But only time will prove.
>
>Rajen Barua
>
>
>>From: "Alpana Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAI
k I know the answer to it also. :)
>
>Also, Assam got within India only in 1947 (or was it in 1950?), isn't it?
>
>With best wishes,
>--Alpana.
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -
>From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>
>
> I will give a small example:
>
> I have a Bengali relative (sort of), who came and told us stories
> about old
> Calcutta - her childhood days, her scientist uncle, about Bengali
> lit
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:43
PM
Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing
Assam?
> Alpana,> First, you are writing as is Assam and India are two
different and separate > entities. However, it is not so.
Politically As
ua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 23:14:20 -0500
>
> > I understand your point. But I failed to understand how you say
>Xongkordev
> > brought India to Assam.
>
>May
subsequently
started in Assam. After twelve years of such wandering
through many sacred.."
- Original Message -
From: "Chan Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alpana Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue
>
To: "Alpana Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
> At 7:49 PM -0500 9/17/02, Alpana Sarangapani wrote:
> >> the appeal in xonkordev's teaching
;- Original Message -
>From: "Saurav Pathak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:30 AM
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for
c: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on AssamNet:
>
> +
> + This is an interesting discussion which re
ke.
>
>Bingo!
>
>Though I wonder why the denial syndrome is so common in these "universal"
>believers.
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Saurav Pathak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>CC: Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ome
>of us are trying to make.
Bingo!
Though I wonder why the denial syndrome is so common in these "universal"
believers.
>From: Saurav Pathak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: R
Assam' is self contradictory.
>Barua
>
>>From: "Alpana Sarangapani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>>Date: Mon, 16 Sep
Very well said.
At 11:37 AM -0400 9/17/02, Saurav Pathak wrote:
>Utpal Brahma said on AssamNet:
>
>+ Under the above hypothesis, we the Bodos who are not
>+ the followers of Vaishnavite Hinduism or any form of
>+ Hinduism as pratised in North India are not Indianized
>+ and hence are not
Utpal Brahma said on AssamNet:
+ Under the above hypothesis, we the Bodos who are not
+ the followers of Vaishnavite Hinduism or any form of
+ Hinduism as pratised in North India are not Indianized
+ and hence are not Indians. The same goes for Khasis,
+ Nagas, Garos, Mishings. Interestin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said on AssamNet:
+
+ This is an interesting discussion which reminds me of an experience I had in
+ Indonesia. Indonesia, Java in particular, is full of Hindu temples. But a
+ number of Indonesians told me that while they are very proud of them, when
+ Indian visit
eptember 17, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>
> This is an interesting discussion which reminds me of an experience I had
in
> Indonesia. Indonesia, Java in particular, is full of Hindu temples. But a
> number of Indonesians told me that while they
This is an interesting discussion which reminds me of an experience I had in
Indonesia. Indonesia, Java in particular, is full of Hindu temples. But a
number of Indonesians told me that while they are very proud of them, when
Indian visitors come they feel ambivalent because, according to the
Rajen Barua said on AssamNet:
+
+ I think that will be a better statement. More correctly, Xongkordev
+ travelled various parts of India, realised the essence of Vaishnavism and
+ created a completely new and revolutionary religious practice in his state
+ Assam the like of which is n
>From: "Supratic Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:55:36 +0900
>
>I have not read the full discussion. But reading the text below,
>would it not
t;
>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 23:55:10 -0500
>
> > Many people do not know that Assam (Assamese for that matter) is a part
>of
> >
ndia.
- Original Message -
From: "Supratic Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:55 PM
Subject: RE: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
> I have not read the full discussion. But reading the text below,
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:55 PM
Subject: RE: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
> I have not read the full discussion. But reading the text below,
> would it not be more appropriate to say that he brought Vaishnavism
> from India to Assam and tried to chang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:14 PM
> To: Rajen Barua; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
>
>
> > I understand your point. But I failed to understand how you say
> Xongkordev
> > brought India t
:)
Best wishes,
--Alpana S.
- Original Message -
From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: Sankardeva responsible for indianizing Assam?
> "But my point was: in order for these t
37 matches
Mail list logo
