Some day I designed a large ASSEMBLER program which needed to
read some QSAM files, and I soon discovered that the out-of-line branches
imposed by the EODAD processing violated the clean structure of the program,
because the input logic of the many files which were read in parallel
was somehow
Team, I'm currently out of the office. I will return on Monday Dec 19, 2011. If
you need immediate assistance while I’m gone, please contact my manager (Peter
Moir). Otherwise, send me an email message and I will respond when I return.
Thank you, Greg Bowers
On 12/10/2011 7:12 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
I actually disdain using the
linkage stack, for these reasons:
BAKR / PR are included in Chapter 10 of the POO: Control
Instructions, not Chapter 7, General Instructions; they
are semiprivileged instructions
I do not believe that that reason has
On 12/10/2011 4:08 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
To solve this problem, I ended up with a GET routine for every QSAM dataset,
where the EODAD address is part of the routine. The GET routine looked like
this (from memory, I don't have the sources at hand):
GET1 PSTART (R10,R14)start macro
On 12/10/2011 6:22 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Hmmm. Are you advocating use of semiprivileged instructions
in application code then? Or only some of them? Which ones
are 'safe' or 'OK' to use in standard application programs?
Where does one draw the line?
Once your minimum supported operating
Once your minimum supported operating system enables use of a particular
semi-privileged instruction, then you can use it just the same as you would any
new macro-based system service provided by that same level of the OS.
Well said
(with the restrictions Ed pointed out) I see no reason not to
Yup,
But the last time I tried it MVCOS was (much) slower than an EXecuted MVC.
Don't remember how it compared to a MVCL(E). But it xould help out if you might
need to move more than 256 bytes but not more than 4096 bytes.
Fred!
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 10, 2011, at 21:01, Steve Comstock
On 12/10/2011 9:44 AM, Martin Truebner wrote:
Once your minimum supported operating system enables use of a particular
semi-privileged instruction, then you can use it just the same as you would any
new macro-based system service provided by that same level of the OS.
Well said
(with the
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:09:39 -0500 Robert A. Rosenberg a...@rarpsl.com
wrote:
:At 12:29 -0600 on 12/09/2011, Robert Ngan wrote about Quick test for
:empty stack?:
:Someone is getting a S0E0 abend with interrupt code of X'34'.
:My memory might be going but since X'E0' = 224 it is in the range
On 12/10/2011 11:41 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Wow! I didn't know I wielded such power. :-)
You da Man! :-D
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
