-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Andreas F. Geissbuehler
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:19 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extended Mnemonics After Unsigned Arithmetic
Snip
My 2 bits:
All,
Is there an easy way to pass the entire SYSLIST to an internal macro for
processing? I have several high level macros that do almost the same thing.
Rather than duplicating the common code in each macro, I would like to use a
common internal macro to do the processing. Something like:
I am currently out of the office and unreachable until Wednesday, January the
2nd, 2013.
If you have a P1, Production Down issue with PowerExchange or UDR products
please make a voice call to Informatica Support and open an SR.
Thanks,
Joey
John Ehrman's resolution of your problem can be improved upon slightly
(if none of the elements of SYSLIST is itself a list) using something
like
|slaidsetc'__syslist_array__'
| gblc(slaid)(1)
|nsle seta n'syslist
|i seta 0
|.sysle_loop anop
|i
I am currently out of the office and unreachable until Tuesday 4/2.
If you have a P1, Production Down issue with PowerExchange or UDR products
please make a voice call to Informatica Support and open an SR.
Thanks,
Joey
At 3/18/2013 11:18 AM, Andreas F. Geissbuehler wrote:
- IBM opcodes will remain [A-Z]
H... TRAP2 and TRAP4 come to mind.
Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com
ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow RoadVOICE:540-456-8536
Afton, VA
And even if this stricture had not already been violated, it was ripe,
even overripe, for violation. Ad hoc notions of this kind are
worthless.
The .MAC and .ASM syntax, on the other hand, . . .
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:39, John Ehrman wrote:
JRBodoh asked:
Is there an easy way to pass the entire SYSLIST to an internal macro for
processing?
I know of no way to do this other than to enumerate the list items, as in
MACROX A,SYSLIST(1),SYSLIST(2),...
for as many arguments as you
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:42, EXT-Schwarz, Barry wrote:
My 2 bits:
- IBM opcodes will remain [A-Z]
Did you mean first letter or entire name? Many macro names contain digits
and at least one contains lower case letters.
Macros perhaps. Opcodes, no. Does HLASM enforce the latter?
Does HLASM
