Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 16:20:55.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 19:08:41.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 16:30:29.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: MHELP bug?" sent
on 11/03/2014 17:00:46.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 18:52:30.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 16:13:38.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: MHELP bug?" sent
on 11/03/2014 17:06:33.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Automatic reply:
AUTO: Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)"
sent on 11/03/2014 16:20:37.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Umberto Silvestri
is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)" sent on 11/03/2014 19:13:36.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "AUTO: Umberto
Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)" sent on 11/03/2014 16:02:17.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "AUTO: Umberto
Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)" sent on 11/03/2014 10:02:08.
Just a peek under the hood reveals that it bounced around IBM UK and escaped!
I am afraid some poor postmaster might soon be DELETED, unprepared, without
I remember (but not details) a small number of email “storms” in the early days
of lists and listserv.
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of David P de Jongh
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:53 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re:
But very hard to imagine a scenario where everyone on this list could figure out how to exclude specific addresses from their OOTO rule. On 03/11/14, John Gilmore wrote: Mark Slater's is the first automatic reply to an automatiic replythat I can remember encountering.It would be easy to imagine
And…I'm replying to myself.
Found a possible instigator. If the macro is being pulled out of the
library, then the BRANCH entries do not show up. But COPY it into your
program, and they do show up.
Again, if anyone is bored at SHARE…:)
On 2014-03-11 09:00, Ray Mullins wrote:
It gets be
It gets better. I've encountered an instance where specifying a pure decimal
term also does not issue the ++//MHELP BRANCH lines.
*sigh* PMR time.
On 2014-03-06 14:44, David P de Jongh wrote:
I misread your post - trying again with X'3F' vs 63, results are
identical, but there are no ++//MHELP
On 11 March 2014 16:20, Steve Comstock wrote:
>
> Great. Now we've got automatic replies to automatic replies.
I was already concerned that the DST change got the best of the respected
audience here, considering there was no reaction on a dozen of those mails.
But then, the gentlemen scheduled
Mark Slater's is the first automatic reply to an automatiic reply
that I can remember encountering.
It would be easy to imagine a scenario in which such traffic grew exponentially.
--
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
On 3/11/2014 9:13 AM, Slater, Mark wrote:
?
I'm currently out of the office until Wednesday 12/03/2014. Any urgent matters
please contact:
Shruthi (shruthi.raveend...@cognizant.com)
Great. Now we've got automatic replies to automatic replies.
-Steve Comstock
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
___
?
I'm currently out of the office until Wednesday 12/03/2014. Any urgent matters
please contact:
Shruthi (shruthi.raveend...@cognizant.com)
MARKSANDSPENCER.COM
Unless otherwise stated above:
Marks and Spencer plc
Registered Office:
Waterside House
35 North Wharf
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "AUTO: Umberto
Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)" sent on 11/03/2014 10:02:08.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Umberto Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)
Note: This is an automated response to your message "AUTO: Umberto
Silvestri is prepared for DELETION (FREEZE)" sent on 11/03/2014 4:01:36.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
21 matches
Mail list logo