File 300 on the CBT LG reg
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:41 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 18:18, Janko Kalinic
>> wrote:
>>
>> Does this imply that TSO TEST supports 64-bit addressing?
>
> Sadly, TSO TEST is a *very* long way from supporting 64-bit
> addressing. You
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 18:18, Janko Kalinic wrote:
> Does this imply that TSO TEST supports 64-bit addressing?
Sadly, TSO TEST is a *very* long way from supporting 64-bit
addressing. You can't even list a 64-bit register or enter a 64-bit
address.
I like to think of TEST as the "vi" of MVS.
Does this imply that TSO TEST supports 64-bit addressing?
Regards,
John K
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:55 AM Jonathan Scott
wrote:
> Ref: Your note of Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:57:36 -0400
>
> > Would like to qualify what I just said
> >
> > . I would like to know if IDF can debug code running in
Ref: Your note of Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:57:36 -0400
> Would like to qualify what I just said
>
> . I would like to know if IDF can debug code running in 64bit memory above
> 4GB.
At the time that IDF support for 64-bit addressing was written,
z/OS did not support code running above 4GB, so my
