On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:42:44 -0400, Tom Marchant
wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:43:20 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>>it is fully possibly to accomplish retrying to a 64-bit address, as I
>>have pointed out, as long as you are willing to sacrifice register 15 (or,
>>if providing your own stub,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:43:20 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>it is fully possibly to accomplish retrying to a 64-bit address, as I
>have pointed out, as long as you are willing to sacrifice register 15 (or,
>if providing your own stub, any other register except perhaps register 0).
I see that
I understand
Thank you
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 8:43 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>
> I think RTM does a RP and RP is setup for a 16 byte PSW you think they
> could of found 8 bytes in SDWARC4
>
>
> RTM does not do a "resume program" (RP instruction). Even if this were
> available for
I think RTM does a RP and RP is setup for a 16 byte PSW you think they
could of found 8 bytes in SDWARC4
RTM does not do a "resume program" (RP instruction). Even if this were
available for the decades that RTM has supported retry, it would not have
been of any help whatsoever.
If someone
