On 12/20/23 12:58:41, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Why not
MACRO
...
&SYSECT &SYSSTYP
&SYSLOC LOCTR
MEND
.
Doesn't &SYSLOC LOCTR imply &SYSECT &SYSSTYP? I don't believe
it creates a duplicate-named location counter in a different section.
Is there an RFE for PUSH CSECT, PUS
Why not
MACRO
...
&SYSECT &SYSSTYP
&SYSLOC LOCTR
MEND
Is there an RFE for PUSH CSECT, PUSH DSECT or PUSH LOCTR?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:46, Paul Gilmartin <
0014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote:
> On 12/20/23 09:21:39, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> > I understand if I want to make it work I’ll have to break up the macro
> into parts finish the fest after I have a CSECT statement
> > .
> It w
On 12/20/23 09:21:39, Joseph Reichman wrote:
I understand if I want to make it work I’ll have to break up the macro into
parts finish the fest after I have a CSECT statement
.
It works as intended as it is. I believe the design objective of
&SYSECT is to allow the coder of a data area DSECT t
I understand if I want to make it work I’ll have to break up the macro into
parts finish the fest after I have a CSECT statement
Thanks
> On Dec 20, 2023, at 11:18 AM, Jonathan Scott
> wrote:
>
> It is clearly documented that &SYSECT is set to the current
> section name on entry to the mac
It is clearly documented that &SYSECT is set to the current
section name on entry to the macro and is not updated if the
macro changes section.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/hla-and-tf/1.6?topic=symbols-sysect-system-variable-symbol
Jonathan Scott, HLASM
IBM Hursley, UK
Trying to explain is great.
But try what I suggested. That way we can see all the moving parts.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 07:58:23 -0500 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I modified cbt file 192
:>
:>Member GRECOV
:>
:>The members have a MODULE
:>
:>Macro it established a base reg and CSECT work area etc
:
I’m at work right now will get back to you later
Thank you
> On Dec 20, 2023, at 10:03 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
>
>
> Your posts are incoherent, and lack much supporting detail necessary for
> anyone to help you. Folks are trying anyway, but you're wasting their time
> and y
Joe,
Your posts are incoherent, and lack much supporting detail necessary for anyone
to help you. Folks are trying anyway, but you're wasting their time and yours.
Please post a description and sample code so we can understand, as others have
repeated asked. A whole sample program can be qui
I modified cbt file 192
Member GRECOV
The members have a MODULE
Macro it established a base reg and CSECT work area etc
The &BASE was not sublist ( for more than one base reg )
I modified that as GRECOV went to two base regs
The sublist code was after the module macro had established a C
It doesn't matter where the macro definition is, only where the invocation is.
Also, where and to what is &USING set?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Assemb
You have been given good advice.
Create a minimal program that shows the problem. Based on the expansion shown,
all you need is register equates and the CSECT statement.
Source should be:
COPY macroname - to place it in the listing
WHATEVER CSECT
12 matches
Mail list logo