On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:16:57 -0400, Barry Lichtenstein
wrote:
Should have been more clear (and replied to OP), I meant the redbook is
outdated! Vendor Interfaces also has lots of useful and current information!
>On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:55:49 -0400, Tom Marchant
>wrote:
>
>I think that's
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:55:49 -0400, Tom Marchant
wrote:
I think that's rather old and outdated. It cites the reasons for Xleaf only as
because there's no WSA and no call mechanism from assembler. Both of those
were remedied. Start with the XL C/C++ Programming Guide here
Documentation for XPLINK and XPLINK64 is in the LE Vendor Interfaces manual.
--
Tom Marchant
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:56:41 +, Richard Way
wrote:
>I'm rather confused about the requirements for converting an existing AMODE 31
>"ordinary" assembler program to one that can participate in an
I'm rather confused about the requirements for converting an existing AMODE 31
"ordinary" assembler program to one that can participate in an XPLINK lp64
environment, and I'm hoping one or more of you can help me to clarify this.
I found documentation here -->
