HLASM vs PoOP for 64-bit load on condition instructions?

2011-06-07 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
I just noticed a conflict between our version of HLASM (z/OS V1.10, HLASM R1.6 PTF UK59311) and the z/Arch PoOP. When I run ASMA90 with the option to print the UNIFIED or ZSERIES-5 level instruction tables, the instruction mnemonics for the 64-bit version of the load on condition instructions

Re: HLASM vs PoOP for 64-bit load on condition instructions?

2011-06-07 Thread Martin Trübner
Which one is correct? And Johns answer: The PoP is correct. Of course- the question itself is heresy ;-) -- Martin Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE more at http://www.picapcpu.de

Re: HLASM vs PoOP for 64-bit load on condition instructions?

2011-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:27, Martin Trübner wrote: Which one is correct? And Johns answer: The PoP is correct. Of course- the question itself is heresy What would happen if, for example, the hardware designers invented some new stack manipulations and named them PUSH and POP? -- gil

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 5 Jun 2011 to 6 Jun 2011 (#2011-96)

2011-06-07 Thread John Walker
I don't often comment here, but I feel motivated to comment about the 'read the manual' comments.  I can't speak for OLD IBM manuals, but I CAN speak for current ones.  You are inundated in spurious and unnecessary things in all the RIGHT places, but frequently the important information is in

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 5 Jun 2011 to 6 Jun 2011 (#2011-96)

2011-06-07 Thread Lindy Mayfield
I worked for a couple of years as a DB2 DBA in DC government before and after Y2K. Around 2003 or so I attended a DB2 conference in Europe. They had some DBA qualification tests. I took a practice test on one of the computers. I failed miserably. -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 5 Jun 2011 to 6 Jun 2011 (#2011-96)

2011-06-07 Thread Tobias Schmid
such, I've given up on IBM manuals 20 years ago. Can anyone give a class on reading current IBM manuals and FIND info(which you don't already know, I can find THAT)? Have you tried this one: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp

Re: HLASM vs PoOP for 64-bit load on condition instructions?

2011-06-07 Thread Tony Harminc
On 7 June 2011 13:15, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:27, Martin Trübner wrote: Which one is correct? And Johns answer: The PoP is correct. Of course- the question itself is heresy What would happen if, for example, the hardware designers invented some

Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 5 Jun 2011 to 6 Jun 2011 (#2011-96)

2011-06-07 Thread Roger Bolan
I'll second Tobias's recommendation: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jspI know you're right about important information sometimes being hidden in obscure places. The solution is to give up on the hard copy