Re: ASMA320W considered harmful

2015-05-28 Thread Martin
You get a warning for this- My favorite is this MVI FIELD,CA'B'mark this with an ASCII B Which is simply impossible -- Martin Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE more at http://www.picapcpu.de

Re: ASMA320W considered harmful

2015-05-28 Thread rkuebbin
Thanks for posting this. I have seen this on CLHHSI and MVHHI where the immediate argument is a character string but not on Jumps. I need to watch for this. Richard Kuebbing IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU wrote on 05/28/2015 09:39:58 AM: From: Steve Smith

ASMA320W considered harmful

2015-05-28 Thread Steve Smith
I don't always check warnings from HLASM, but today it's a good thing I did: 2DBC A7E5 96EE 00015B98 5858+ JAS R14,FORMAT_OFFSET_FIELD ASMA320W Immediate field operand may have incorrect sign or magnitude The generic immediate field warning is not appropriate here.

Re: ASMA320W considered harmful

2015-05-28 Thread Martin
Steve, The generic immediate field warning is not appropriate here. This is a guaranteed wild branch. Yea- but the warning informs you that for long distances JASL is better -- Martin Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE more at http://www.picapcpu.de

Re: ASMA320W considered harmful

2015-05-28 Thread Robert Ngan
Yes, I did not notice this warning but the subsequent branch to oblivion got my attention. Didn't realize the csect had ballooned to 96K so it was possible for jump targets to be more than 64K away. Robert Ngan CSC Financial Services Group IBM Mainframe Assembler List