Re: YA MGCRE RCF?
Most code examples in IBM manuals are pretty poor examples of coding, and I'd think IBM would take more care with them, just because it would make them look smarter. Nevertheless, as Charles alluded, they serve their purpose, and I've found them useful many times. But I'd never copy them. sas On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:49 PM Charles Mills wrote: > Well, a doc writer giving examples has to balance between trivial versus > overly complex, and has to make certain assumptions about the reader's > knowledge and environment. > > This example is flawed as you indicate but I would find it useful. It at > least shows the format of TEXT and CONSNAME. > > Charles > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 3:45 PM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: YA MGCRE RCF? > > Well, that got terribly garbled. Trying a different way. > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:30:13 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >Do I have cause for an RCF here? > > > >In z/OS 2.5 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services > Reference, Volume 3 (LLA-SDU) > >IBM SA23-1374-50 > > > >I see: MGCRE - Execute form > > > DOMTST CSECT > R2 EQU 2 > USING *,R12 > LAR2,CMD R2 POINTS TO THE COMMAND AREA > MGCRE MF=(E,LAREA),TEXT=(R2),CMDFLAG=(NOHCPY),CONSNAME=MYCON > CMD DS0CL6 THE COMMAND AREA > CMDLEN DCXL2'4' LENGTH OF COMMAND > CMDCOMM DCCL4'D C 'THE ACTUAL COMMAND > MYCONDCCL8'CON4'NAME OF ISSUING CONSOLE > LAREAMGCRE MF=L LIST FORM OF MGCRE > END > > It's inconsistent that there is an EQU for R2 but not R12. > > The content of R12 is nowhere defined, by e.g. LR R12,R15. > > Has this code been tested? > > Outside this example, the doc does not mention a need for > CSECT addressability. Is this generally assumed, > or must it be asserted for each macro? | > > -- > Thanks, > gil >
Re: YA MGCRE RCF?
Well, a doc writer giving examples has to balance between trivial versus overly complex, and has to make certain assumptions about the reader's knowledge and environment. This example is flawed as you indicate but I would find it useful. It at least shows the format of TEXT and CONSNAME. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 3:45 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: YA MGCRE RCF? Well, that got terribly garbled. Trying a different way. On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:30:13 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Do I have cause for an RCF here? > >In z/OS 2.5 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Reference, Volume 3 (LLA-SDU) >IBM SA23-1374-50 > >I see: MGCRE - Execute form > DOMTST CSECT R2 EQU 2 USING *,R12 LAR2,CMD R2 POINTS TO THE COMMAND AREA MGCRE MF=(E,LAREA),TEXT=(R2),CMDFLAG=(NOHCPY),CONSNAME=MYCON CMD DS0CL6 THE COMMAND AREA CMDLEN DCXL2'4' LENGTH OF COMMAND CMDCOMM DCCL4'D C 'THE ACTUAL COMMAND MYCONDCCL8'CON4'NAME OF ISSUING CONSOLE LAREAMGCRE MF=L LIST FORM OF MGCRE END It's inconsistent that there is an EQU for R2 but not R12. The content of R12 is nowhere defined, by e.g. LR R12,R15. Has this code been tested? Outside this example, the doc does not mention a need for CSECT addressability. Is this generally assumed, or must it be asserted for each macro? | -- Thanks, gil
Re: YA MGCRE RCF?
Well, that got terribly garbled. Trying a different way. On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:30:13 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Do I have cause for an RCF here? > >In z/OS 2.5 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Reference, Volume 3 (LLA-SDU) >IBM SA23-1374-50 > >I see: MGCRE - Execute form > DOMTST CSECT R2 EQU 2 USING *,R12 LAR2,CMD R2 POINTS TO THE COMMAND AREA MGCRE MF=(E,LAREA),TEXT=(R2),CMDFLAG=(NOHCPY),CONSNAME=MYCON CMD DS0CL6 THE COMMAND AREA CMDLEN DCXL2'4' LENGTH OF COMMAND CMDCOMM DCCL4'D C 'THE ACTUAL COMMAND MYCONDCCL8'CON4'NAME OF ISSUING CONSOLE LAREAMGCRE MF=L LIST FORM OF MGCRE END It's inconsistent that there is an EQU for R2 but not R12. The content of R12 is nowhere defined, by e.g. LR R12,R15. Has this code been tested? Outside this example, the doc does not mention a need for CSECT addressability. Is this generally assumed, or must it be asserted for each macro? | -- Thanks, gil
YA MGCRE RCF?
Do I have cause for an RCF here? In z/OS 2.5 MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Reference, Volume 3 (LLA-SDU) IBM SA23-1374-50 I see: MGCRE - Execute form |DOMTST CSECT R2 EQU 2 USING *,R12 LA R2,CMD R2 POINTS TO THE COMMAND AREA MGCRE MF=(E,LAREA),TEXT=(R2),CMDFLAG=(NOHCPY),CONSNAME=MYCON CMD DS 0CL6 THE COMMAND AREA CMDLEN DC XL2'4' LENGTH OF COMMAND CMDCOMM DC CL4'D C ' THE ACTUAL COMMAND MYCON DC CL8'CON4 ' NAME OF ISSUING CONSOLE LAREA MGCRE MF=L LIST FORM OF MGCRE END It's inconsistent that there is an EQU for R2 but not R12. The content of R12 is nowhere defined, by e.g. LR R12,R15. Has this code been tested? Outside this example, the doc does not mention a need for CSECT addressability. Is this generally assumed, or must it be asserted for each macro? | -- Thanks, gil
