I created a macro to generate parmlists with optional specification for how
an operand is addressed. Briefly,
CALLV program,(parm1,parm2,(parm3,Y),parm4)
where parm3 would be addressed with LAY instead of LA. The macro actually
just appends the 2nd operand to LA (i.e. 'LA(,2)'), so it's
Peter Relson writes:
> An entertaining thought for an assembler enhancement would be
> a pseudo-op that generated "LA" or "LARL" depending on whether
> the target was in a CSECT or a DSECT (maybe allowing for LAY
> too).
We've often had suggestions for instructions that generate
alternative
ASSEMBLER-LIST Archives
IBM Mainframe Assembler List
ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options:Use Forum View
Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers
Message:[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:27:06 +, Peter Relson wrote:
>Definitely the lack of an equate for R12 should be corrected (such as by
>adding an equate and a BASR R12,0). I'll get that taken care of.
>
Thanks. But I may have misled myself by seeing CSECT; USING *; ...; END,
and assuming a user
Definitely the lack of an equate for R12 should be corrected (such as by adding
an equate and a BASR R12,0). I'll get that taken care of.
Almost all macros expect some amount of addressability to static data for
certain invocations. That will not be stated for individual macros. That is why
