Paul Gilmartin's recent post---I entirely agree with its substance---has
suggested to me yet again that we must take care to distinguish
o the HLASM proper, its quality and the quality of its documentation, from
o those of other operating-system facilities that are implemented in assembly
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:14, John Ehrman wrote:
... but I have a suspicion, which has been voiced here before, that IBM's
internal use of PL/X instead of assembly language has led to significant
deterioration in the currency of the assembly-language documentation that
the rest of us, outside
