Re: worthy of an RFE?

John, sorry- I did need a second and third pass reading what you said- I did not get the fact that it is NOT fixed at a later level. I say YES go for an RFE- this is more than needed. I could now repeat Garys W. arguments, but ... Martin

Re: worthy of an RFE?

Your *+4 would be incorrect in more than 1 way. Here's another case where more liberal immediate operands (LLILF Rx,Q(CEEx)) would come in handy. sas On 3/8/2017 10:23, Gary Weinhold wrote: I think it is worth RFEing. Reentrant baseless code is a desirable standard and IBM's own code

Re: worthy of an RFE?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, wrote: > > Using ceepccal hlasm , goff, rent & base0 > In code (base 0): > > provads 0h > la 2,ceepcall_w > larl 15,modulo > CEEPCALL (15),(END_TIME,START_TIME),VL,MF=(E,(2)) > j dopo

Re: worthy of an RFE?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Gary Weinhold wrote: > I think it is worth RFEing. Reentrant baseless code is a desirable > standard and IBM's own code should not be thwarting it. And over the years > my experience has been that LE has on occasion ignored HLASM standards and

Rif: worthy of an RFE?

Using ceepccal hlasm , goff, rent & base0 In code (base 0): provads 0h la 2,ceepcall_w larl 15,modulo CEEPCALL (15),(END_TIME,START_TIME),VL,MF=(E,(2)) j dopo EXTRN modulo modulo XATTR

Re: worthy of an RFE?

I think it is worth RFEing. Reentrant baseless code is a desirable standard and IBM's own code should not be thwarting it. And over the years my experience has been that LE has on occasion ignored HLASM standards and trends. They should be reminded that they should interface nicely with

Re: worthy of an RFE?

John, I would not RFE it- it is there and you could copy the macro to the older system. sidenote: I would have done it with r14 (less thinking time at converting the macro ;-) ) Martin

worthy of an RFE?

This is likely not worth the bother, but I have a "problem" with the CEEPCALL macro. Yes, I write LE enabled HLASM. Mainly so that I can easily inter-operate with C. I like to use "baseless" coding techniques. One problem that I had, which required a base register be used, is that I use the