Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Rebuild log - HELO line

2009-09-16 Thread Steve Mallindine
Are we talking about log or email report? I get the same (email report) HELO Blacklist: new -0 : altogether - 0 HELOs Granted, I VERY rarely get any direct helo's as all my mail is routed via external server Steve On 9/17/09 9:24 AM, "Thomas Eckardt/eck" wrote: >> With v2, in my r

[Assp-test] Antwort: Rebuild log - HELO line

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>With v2, in my rebuild log, I see >HELO Blacklist: new -1742 : altogether - 1160/2048 HELOs What's that ? This is not a log line from the V2 - rebuild thread!! Do you use 'rebuildspamdb.pl' with a V2 installation? This could destroy your data - depending on your config! There is no 'rebuildspam

[Assp-test] Antwort: noGriplistUpload being ignored v2.0.1 rc 0.4.13

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
This will be fixed in 4.15. Thomas K Post 16.09.2009 21:40 Bitte antworten an ASSP development mailing list An ASSP development mailing list Kopie Thema [Assp-test] noGriplistUpload being ignored v2.0.1 rc 0.4.13 I have noGriplistUpload checked, but in my rebuild log, I get: Uplo

[Assp-test] Issue With TLS/SSL in ASSP 1.5.1.x

2009-09-16 Thread Steve Moss
I originally posted this bug report to the assp-user list, but it seems that list is not actively supported now... I have recently renewed our SSL certificate, generated the new cert and key files, and installed them into our ASSP 1.5.1.6. Prior to this (i.e., with our old SSL cert) ASSP worked fi

[Assp-test] Rebuild log - HELO line

2009-09-16 Thread K Post
With v2, in my rebuild log, I see HELO Blacklist: new -1742 : altogether - 1160/2048 HELOs What does the 1160/2048 mean? -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event yo

[Assp-test] noGriplistUpload being ignored v2.0.1 rc 0.4.13

2009-09-16 Thread K Post
I have noGriplistUpload checked, but in my rebuild log, I get: Uploading Griplist via Direct Connection Submitted 915 bytes: 211 IPv4 addresses It seems that noGriplistUpload is being ignored. Anyone else seeing this? --

Re: [Assp-test] fixes and news in 2.0.1_RC0.4.14

2009-09-16 Thread K Post
Can't wait to give it a shot. Thanks so much for putting the menus at the top! On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck < thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > fixed in 2.0.1_RC0.4.14 > > - MainThread and MaintThread running in to a collision saving > asspstats.sav > - the '.' in Conf

[Assp-test] fixes and news in 2.0.1_RC0.4.14

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
fixed in 2.0.1_RC0.4.14 - MainThread and MaintThread running in to a collision saving asspstats.sav - the '.' in ConfigMakeSlRe is not masked - 'i.a' and 'ira' are detected as equal changed: - some not important changes in GUI text added: - a menu at the top of the GUI was added (to prevent

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re:fixesandnewsin 2.0.1_RC0.4.12

2009-09-16 Thread K Post
I don't believe that I'm saying this but - it's clear! Thank you. On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck < thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > >Does this mean that I can delete all of the > files that were used to build the current spamdb? > > Yes. > > >1 only one message > to the

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re:fixesandnewsin 2.0.1_RC0.4.12

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>Does this mean that I can delete all of the files that were used to build the current spamdb? Yes. >1 only one message to the server and it's spam. This will be added to the spamdb right? No - too less files - but if more files exists - yes >If so, let's just say for simplicity, that then nex

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re:fixesandnewsin 2.0.1_RC0.4.12

2009-09-16 Thread K Post
Wow- First, Thomas, thanks for taking the time yet again to discuss this. Your explanation this time finally got through to me! I get it now, at least most of it... I must have misunderstood one explanation or another and mistakenly thought that assp doesn't pay attention to duplicates. Thank

Re: [Assp-test] (no subject)

2009-09-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >This whole section in the left side of the GUI is missing in versions >newer >than 1.5.1.7(0.2.02): > > White-/Red-/Greylist > View Log > Mail Analyzer > Info and Stats > SMTP Connections > Shutdown/Restart It is in the top --

[Assp-test] (0.2.11)

2009-09-16 Thread Hill, Brett
2 things: 1. In both IE 7 and Firefox 3.5, The new menu at the top is not visible after a restart of the ASSP service. It only shows after you click on something in the left-hand menu (like "Main" for example). Then it shows up everytime after that. So, if the first thing I want to see after

[Assp-test] (no subject)

2009-09-16 Thread Sony
This whole section in the left side of the GUI is missing in versions newer than 1.5.1.7(0.2.02): White-/Red-/Greylist View Log Mail Analyzer Info and Stats SMTP Connections Shutdown/Restart -- Come build with us!

[Assp-test] Bug reading spamtrapaddresses

2009-09-16 Thread Alex Frunza
Weird thing happened today...I have a user, i...@ascomex.ro that didn't receive a mail she was supposed to. ASSP mistakenly confused her with the spamtrap address i...@ascomex.ro, although ika is a user defined in LocalAddresses_FLAT (the spamtrap was made by ASSP with do penalty make traps. I

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Attachment Blocking Returns 250 OK ?

2009-09-16 Thread Alex Frunza
Have the same problem. And 2.10 won't start as a service either, 1053 timeout error again... On 9/16/2009 5:52 PM, Paul Houlbrooke wrote: > Paul Houlbrooke wrote: > >> Moving to 2.09 now err.. 2.10. >> >> > Error when starting 2.10 > > C:\ASSP>perl assp.pl > Global symbol "%this" re

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Attachment Blocking Returns 250 OK ?

2009-09-16 Thread Paul Houlbrooke
Paul Houlbrooke wrote: > Moving to 2.09 now err.. 2.10. > Error when starting 2.10 C:\ASSP>perl assp.pl Global symbol "%this" requires explicit package name at assp.pl line 9426. BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at assp.pl line 24653. 2.09 starts fine. ---

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Attachment Blocking Returns 250 OK ?

2009-09-16 Thread Paul Houlbrooke
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: > >> No QUIT is received. >> > > I did a different approach in 09 (move to null connection). It works > here but as Thomas already mentioned this is extremely dependent from > the sending MTA. > In the end you may have to

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.03) "forged HELO" issues

2009-09-16 Thread GrayHat
> Working fine for me. same here > I would like to see the "Connections" link as for the "connections", if you're running ASSP on win32, pick this critter http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx start it and select the "perl" process running the ASSP, right click and se

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.03) "forged HELO" issues

2009-09-16 Thread Hill, Brett
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > >forward to .09 > > Is the service starting ? Working fine for me. I would like to see the "Connections" link in the menu above open in a new window like it used to. You should also probably change Whitelist to read Whitelist/Redlist. Kind Regards, Brett

[Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.09): SRS logging

2009-09-16 Thread GrayHat
Not sure if this is expected behaviour or just some "excessive logging" but it seems like ASSP is logging the SAME "SRS failure" message a lot of times for the SAME incoming message; here is an example Sep-16-09 12:39:45 msg-04775-13255 [SRS] 12.34.56.78 <> to: xxx...@.zzz [scoring] (bounce ad

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Attachment Blocking Returns 250 OK ?

2009-09-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list schreibt: >No QUIT is received. I did a different approach in 09 (move to null connection). It works here but as Thomas already mentioned this is extremely dependent from the sending MTA. In the end you may have to disable the send250OKISP. ---

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.03) "forged HELO" issues

2009-09-16 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
GrayHat schreibt: >forward to .09 Is the service starting ? -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skil

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Attachment Blocking Returns 250 OK ?

2009-09-16 Thread Paul Houlbrooke
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > ASSP development mailing list > schreibt: > >> Also, 2.07 is not starting as a Windows service... I had to start it >> directly via perl. >> > > > Ok, sorry, but now at least we are coming closer to this strange > service thing in V1. > Was there something in the

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.03) "forged HELO" issues

2009-09-16 Thread GrayHat
> Working on the "bug" theory, have you tried going back to an earlier > version to see if the same applies? yes; rolled back to previous version and it disappeared; today moved forward to .09 and the "bug" isn't there either --

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7(0.2.03) "forged HELO" issues

2009-09-16 Thread Hill, Brett
GrayHat wrote: > > I don't think the validformat/invalidformat play a rule here; > tried to disable both checks and emails still got rejected > due to "forged Helo", disabled the "DoFakedLocalHelo" and the > mails got through, so it's definitely an issue with the > "forged helo" check and not

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re:fixesandnewsin 2.0.1_RC0.4.12

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt/eck
>If we do this, we can remove what's probably the same message rebuildspamdb parses the content of all files (except marked for deletion) and is doing a MD5 hash over the MIME-decoded and cleaned up body - so we know exactly (not probably!!) if the same message content was processed before. If