Hi all,
Fixed in 2.0.1_RC0.7.01
The following could be happen if https was used for the GUI or SSL/TLS was
used for SMTP:
- the GUI is shown incomplete
- submitting any changes in the GUI results in a waiting or empty browser
window
- SMTP SSL/TLS connections are unexpected dropped in the
Unable to download a good copy of the current assp.pl
I have tried from a Linux KDE desktop and from a Server 2008 desktop.
Have disable all proxy settings etc.
Any other ideas?
Daniel Du Vall
http://1peter4-10.org http://1peter4-10.org
http://volkswageninsanity.us
What download link has you tried?
Thomas
Von:Daniel K. Du Vall dduv...@1peter4-10.org
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 19.01.2010 15:29
Betreff:[Assp-test] Unable to download
Unable to download a good copy of the current assp.pl
I
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp2/
http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/0001B38B-801C/ASSP-V2-Do
wnloads/assp.pl
Daniel Du Vall
http://1peter4-10.org
http://volkswageninsanity.us
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt/eck
I've had similar problems trying to download from cvs.sourceforge
Goto http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp2/assp.pl
Find latest file (should be first in list), right click 'download' and 'save
as'.
Works for me...
Steve
On 1/19/10 5:35 PM, Daniel K. Du Vall
Thanks that link worked :-)
Daniel Du Vall
http://1peter4-10.org
http://volkswageninsanity.us
-Original Message-
From: Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine) [mailto:st...@sc.ru.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 7:46 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test]
I'm having some trouble with our users getting facebook messages and
looking for suggestions on how to fix this.
Do you think it's a good idea to no process message from facebook?
We do see lots of bogus messages from @facebook.com senders, that
don't pass spf validation. Language is the same as
Hi all.
I'm bringing this up again, as we're finding the need for this
functionality it more and more as people get onto mailing lists that
won't unsubscribe them, but others want to stay on the mailing list.
Person A doesn't want to get any email from domain X, but it's not
really spam mail, so
I just noticed one of the facebook messages being blocked:
DNSBL, 69.63.178.178 listed in bl.spamcop.net
so it's not even a bayesian error...
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:40 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble with our users getting facebook messages and
looking for
Seconded.
Not that this situation has arisen for me yet, but I had thought that
it's a possibility...
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 19.01.2010, at 18:48, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I'm bringing this up again, as we're finding the need for this
functionality it more and
Yeah, some of Facebook's outbound SMTP servers have been listed in
spamcop for over a week now. I asked them about it, and they said:
This IP is sending spam to our spamtraps. Our spamtraps have never
sent mail and so should never receive mail. If it's important that
you receive mail from
Hi all,
I want to release V2 on SF for public in March. Until then, all feature
requests will be queued. Code changes will only be done for bug fixing.
2.0.1_RC0.7.01 is the last version number that contains the 'RC' - this is
done to make sure that all version depending features are working.
This IP is sending spam to our spamtraps. Our spamtraps have never
sent mail and so should never receive mail. If it's important that
you receive mail from these IPs, I'd suggest you whitelist them
locally.
Right, spamtraps are totally random addresses which are NOT
used at all, they
I want to release V2 on SF for public in March.
Cool.
I observed, that the last versions (maybe from 20 on) needs very long
to start on my machine. Assp creeps for 5 minutes without doing
nothing visible in the log. Conuming variable low memory from 65-80M
and then, after this time
Thanks Thomas, but I think I'm looking for slightly different
functionality. I'm looking to outright ALLOW mail only for certain
domains if the SPF verifies. If SPF verifies for these domains, let
the mail through, ignore dnsbl, ignore bayesian, and noprocess.
It would be even better if we
I think you can do it with 'bombHeaderRe'.
looking for a recipient:
\nto:[^\r\n]+?the_recipie...@your_domain\.com
looking for a senders domain:
\nfrom:[^\r\n]+...@sender_domain\.com
now combine the two regexes to block all mails from that domain to this
recipient
first case - from: before
There is no general option to do this.
use 'blockstrictSPFRe' and all mails (from a domain that in there) with
failing SPF will be blocked.
If you want to skip some test for this domain use the 'skip' or
'DoNot...' functions in any section you want. It is possible to write on
file with
Facebook is in an out of spamcop all the time. Whitelist them.
I caution you on your SPF ideas as it os possible for spammers to
spoof SPF, and we are seeing it more often.
I like SPF as a weighted idea, and spamcop too. Spamcop is one dnsbl
you can not just block / accept on unless you have
If facebook has sent to spamtraps, they deserve the listing. I
understand users do not understand this, but as long as spamcop is
accurate, this is 100% proof positive that facebook scrapes the web.
--
Scott
(Sent from a mobile device)
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Scott MacLean
Now that's just plain incredible! I didn't know that that Bomb was so powerful.
I have our bombs set to block. Are you saying that I could leave it
as block, but if i put the =weight at the end of a line, a match for
that line won't block, but will score either as a percentage of the
bomb score
Ill reply to your spf records issue as I have time. I am not a fan of spf, so
may be biased :)
My understanding of the spamtrap scenario with spamcop, for which they
obviously give very little information to protect their system is that it is
near impossible to accidentally hit a spamtrap.
I just had an email from a user trying to send an email to 27
recipients, which was blocked (as it should have been). He received
this error (addresses redacted):
5.7.1 too many recipients for sen...@email.com in 60 seconds -
please try again not before Jan-19-10 20:58:59 or send a
to anyone who tries to spam the server
Not to anyone - only to your local users. But this will be changed.
Thomas
Von:Scott MacLean a...@hollsco.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 20.01.2010 04:23
Betreff:[Assp-test]
Matti, please start assp in a command line. Tell me where in the startup
sequence assp take too much time. There are done some extenstive checks on
windows systems at startup.
Thomas
Von:Matti Haack m.ha...@haack-it.de
An: ASSP development mailing list
Hi all,
changed in 2.0.1_0.7.02:
- the reply on a local frequency blocking has shown the addresses defined
in 'EmailAdmins' - the reply is changed to
554 5.7.1 too many recipients for ... - please try again not before
... or send a notification message to your postmaster or local
25 matches
Mail list logo
