Re: [Assp-test] Logging - info: found message size announcement

2010-05-17 Thread Thomas Eckardt
>found message size announcement disable 'SessionLog' and the message will go away Thomas Von:K Post An: ASSP development mailing list Datum: 17.05.2010 10:21 Betreff:[Assp-test] Logging - info: found message size announcement I'm not sure if assp changed or if I changed

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Paul K. Dickson
IMO loan is an EVIL word when it comes to spam.. I don't want it getting ANY good credit at all, I just don't want it rejected. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x1

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
maybe it is a solution to put loan=>0.5 into whitere. -- ___ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Paul K. Dickson
Yeah.. I know I know, it allows a ton of spam to come in.. However I saw a couple good mails that were blocked with VERY important email regarding someone's loan situation. I hate to clog user's junk folder, but I think if I were them I'd rather have an extra 20 spam in there a day then have my at

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Is that intentional, that spamloverre is set to "loan"? >ay-16-10 16:00:10 40006-10676 74.208.158.4 > >to: swinpig...@fredco-md.net Regex:SpamLover 'Loan'; -- ___ Assp-test mai

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Paul K. Dickson
OK. I change MaxEquaHeader from the default of 10 to 3 and the ptr check to block. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 > From: Fritz Borgstedt > Reply-To

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
I was hoping that -Maximum Equal X-Header Lines (MaxEqualXHeader) would catch it. You may set it to 3. Try to get the message by setting DoPTRCheck to block -- ___ Assp-test m

[Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

2010-05-17 Thread Paul K. Dickson
It is from the same email each time. Fritz, Here is the log with the context lines. Is there anything else I can get you to help determine why this email trips up assp? ay-16-10 16:00:10 40006-10676 74.208.158.4 to: swinpig...@fredco-md.net Regex:SpamLover 'Loan'; May-16-10 16:00:15 40006-106

[Assp-test] Logging - info: found message size announcement

2010-05-17 Thread K Post
I'm not sure if assp changed or if I changed something, but I'm now seeing entries like: info: found message size announcement: 7.51 kByte in my log for every connection. I don't think that this used to be the case, but it is 4am here after a very long day, so please excuse me if it's just my un

[Assp-test] MainThread and worker errors - serivcecheck / bad file descriptor / unkown error failed IO::Socket::SSL=GLOB(0x1acccc74)

2010-05-17 Thread K Post
Windows 2003 box, running assp 2.0.2(1.0.12) SMTP stopped responding this evening with MainThread errors in the log that refer to SSL socket errors that I don't have a clue about. The admin web interface was responsive, but I couldn't get the Worker stats page to come up. Perl.exe was running at

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.2_1.1.06

2010-05-17 Thread K Post
Thanks for the insight. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: >>Do you think that might be what I was seeing sporatically in at the >>end of my rebuilds? > > I do not know that. > > I think you use Windows, and there this should be never the case. System > signals sent globaly to

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.2_1.1.06

2010-05-17 Thread GrayHat
>> Thomas; does the URIBL weitghting work like the DNSBL now ? > Sorry - no. It is not so easy to do - but you'll find it in the > release notes, if it is finished. No problem and no hurry, mind me; I was just asking so that I could eventually test it, see I've a custom uribl ready for testing a

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in 2.0.2_1.1.06

2010-05-17 Thread Thomas Eckardt
>Thomas; does the URIBL weitghting work like the DNSBL now ? Sorry - no. It is not so easy to do - but you'll find it in the release notes, if it is finished. The (also now) problem is, that we stop searching on the first match (hit), but this could be an URI with a very soft weight - any one o