Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

2010-05-03 Thread bytehd
thanks for that link explains why when i first setup ASSP, I used debian and tried to upgrade to perl 5.10 later thinking it would be faster (oh please its interpreted) and watched as apt removed grub, the kernel, and most of the bin files as I removed perl. that was a cool learning

Re: [Assp-test] Interesting approach to nuking spam

2010-01-28 Thread bytehd
ASSP works better. and its legal. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Interesting-approach-to-nuking-spam-tp27315252p27366470.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.1.2 is still 1.6.1.1?

2009-12-01 Thread bytehd
run a diff on them also noticed that 1.6.1.2 gets updated everyday. slipstreaming at its best change the code, keep the version number the same. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/1.6.1.2-is-still-1.6.1.1--tp26423250p26594237.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Memory Leakage and crash under linux

2009-11-02 Thread bytehd
to be looked at as candidates for C, where things could be optimized much more? Not trying to bash on perl in any way, I am genuinely curious to understand this issue. -- Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * On Nov 1, 2009, at 2:45 PM, bytehd wrote: running

Re: [Assp-test] Where to download version 2?

2009-11-02 Thread bytehd
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/ site not down Lists wrote: http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S0615ADC0?WasRead=1 Site is down. -- Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ * --

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Memory Leakage and crash under linux

2009-11-01 Thread bytehd
running 1.5.1.18 uptime is measures in months 1.x doesnt leak memory as bad thats why v2 will be v3 before we switch to it a9k3d wrote: Thanks for the restart advice. Good to know. It does help. On Oct 30, 2009, at 11:33 PM, Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine) wrote: Alan, I'm

[Assp-test] 1.5 or 1.6

2009-10-01 Thread bytehd
:) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.5-or-1.6-tp25703138p25703138.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.5.1.7 retracted

2009-09-24 Thread bytehd
should we drop back to 1.5.1.6 or go to 1.5.1.8? Fritz Borgstedt wrote: There is an report about a bug in the handling of option files. Until we find out what is the cause of this report we retract 1.5.1.7. After solving this problem we will continue the series with 1.5.1.8

Re: [Assp-test] Something has gone very wrong, RC22+?

2009-04-30 Thread bytehd
this project needs to seriously fork and gain new developers. Scott MacLean-4 wrote: Well my system has inexplicably become stable once more. It was locking up every 30-45 seconds until 12:56 am, then it ran until 1:08 am, then until 3:09 am, and has been up since then with no problems -

Re: [Assp-test] New 1.5.2 Beta

2009-02-20 Thread bytehd
some time-consuming tasks which ones? GrayHat wrote: what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0? what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2? what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2? simple, the 2.0 if fully multithreaded, but that means that it needs a lot more memory; the scope for

Re: [Assp-test] New 1.5.2 Beta

2009-02-20 Thread bytehd
you too huh GrayHat wrote: some time-consuming tasks which ones? look at the source code :D -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest

Re: [Assp-test] New 1.5.2 Beta

2009-02-19 Thread bytehd
what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0? what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2? what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-1.5.2-Beta-tp22038898p22109980.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Assp-test] New 1.5.2 Beta

2009-02-19 Thread bytehd
what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0? what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2? what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-1.5.2-Beta-tp22038898p22109984.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Assp-test] Graphing Statistics

2009-02-15 Thread bytehd
yes there is interest! are you volunteering? perhaps something like this: http://www.imgx.org/public/view/full/867 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Graphing-Statistics-tp22026483p22027096.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Assp-test] Graphing Statistics

2009-02-15 Thread bytehd
but this is what I have so far (somewhat simple to do, maybe not simple to all ASSP users.) Jerry -Original Message- From: bytehd [mailto:byt...@us.net] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 13:26 To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Graphing Statistics yes

[Assp-test] Success of MT vs ST?

2008-12-30 Thread bytehd
Has anyone noticed a difference? Only high-utilization sites or all sites? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Success-of-MT-vs-ST--tp21224749p21224749.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2 does TLS

2008-12-07 Thread bytehd
yea this is a really big deal thanks FRitz!! tanstaafl_bh wrote: On 12/7/2008 1:15 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: ASSP 2 does TLS ! loud applauseawesome - thanks Fritz!/loud applause -- SF.Net email is

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.3.3.10 Update released on sf.net

2008-07-20 Thread bytehd
lll try it out moving up is not an option until stable Kevin-158 wrote: Changelog and release notes here: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=69172release_id=607988 Even if you are running a newer version of ASSP already I recommend getting the updated scripts and

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2

2008-04-03 Thread bytehd
Threads 1.69: Perl package or some other lib? tanstaafl_bh wrote: On 4/2/2008 7:05 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: ASSP 1.3.6 is obsolet introducing ASSP 2.0.0 (0.0) (multithreaded) Perl 5.8.8-822 is needed threads 1.69 is needed Wow! Someone's been busy! :) Looks like it may be

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-03-04 Thread bytehd
what maint tasks are killing ASSP? can you provide a listing of functions and execution times for a given load? sorted by time? (not asking for much huh) Guess im coming from the great app dev tools you get on the winblows side to MT, generally you are looking at encapsulating anything that can

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-03-04 Thread bytehd
Craig how do I find out the versions of the threading modules that i have? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/a-multi-threaded-assp-tp15723508p15842547.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-02-27 Thread bytehd
yes. since perl is not multi-threaded how did you do yours? C? the obvious place is to allow multiple simultaneous smtp sessions. Craig Schmitt wrote: Is anyone interested in testing a multi-threaded version of assp? I've been working on converting 1.3.5 to run all of the maintenance

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-02-27 Thread bytehd
–Dusethreads ? or activestate? Kevin-158 wrote: bytehd wrote: yes. since perl is not multi-threaded how did you do yours? Perl has has threading since 5.6 and it became stable in 5.8. It is a little bit different than most threading models however. Kevin

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-02-27 Thread bytehd
ok. So where in Fritz' code do you insert the break point? or do you run concurrent processes? will there be a master handler thread that decides ok im realy busy now so spawn im not a perl monk, so im not sure of the libraries available on linux pthreads are used but until 5.8 perl used fork

Re: [Assp-test] a multi-threaded assp

2008-02-27 Thread bytehd
count me in Craig Schmitt wrote: - Original Message - From: bytehd [EMAIL PROTECTED] So where in Fritz' code do you insert the break point? or do you run concurrent processes? will there be a master handler thread that decides ok im realy busy now so spawn im not a perl

Re: [Assp-test] Winmail.dat decoding - WAS: Re: 1.3.6

2008-01-06 Thread bytehd
Otherwise, this kind of comment is irrelevant coming from a user. yeah who needs them anyways -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.3.6-tp14632303p14649102.html Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.