thanks for that link
explains why when i first setup ASSP, I used debian and tried to upgrade to
perl 5.10
later thinking it would be faster (oh please its interpreted) and watched as
apt removed
grub, the kernel, and most of the bin files as I removed perl.
that was a cool learning
ASSP works better.
and its legal.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Interesting-approach-to-nuking-spam-tp27315252p27366470.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
run a diff on them
also noticed that 1.6.1.2 gets updated everyday.
slipstreaming at its best
change the code, keep the version number the same.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/1.6.1.2-is-still-1.6.1.1--tp26423250p26594237.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list
to be
looked at as candidates for C, where things could be optimized much
more?
Not trying to bash on perl in any way, I am genuinely curious to
understand this issue.
--
Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
On Nov 1, 2009, at 2:45 PM, bytehd wrote:
running
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/
site not down
Lists wrote:
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S0615ADC0?WasRead=1
Site is down.
--
Scott * If you contact me off list replace talklists@ with scott@ *
--
running 1.5.1.18
uptime is measures in months
1.x doesnt leak memory as bad
thats why v2 will be v3 before we switch to it
a9k3d wrote:
Thanks for the restart advice. Good to know. It does help.
On Oct 30, 2009, at 11:33 PM, Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve
Mallindine) wrote:
Alan,
I'm
:)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/1.5-or-1.6-tp25703138p25703138.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference
should we drop back to 1.5.1.6 or go to 1.5.1.8?
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
There is an report about a bug in the handling of option files. Until
we find out what is the cause of this report we retract 1.5.1.7.
After solving this problem we will continue the series with 1.5.1.8
this project needs to seriously fork and gain new developers.
Scott MacLean-4 wrote:
Well my system has inexplicably become stable once more. It was
locking up every 30-45 seconds until 12:56 am, then it ran until 1:08
am, then until 3:09 am, and has been up since then with no problems -
some time-consuming tasks
which ones?
GrayHat wrote:
what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0?
what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2?
what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2?
simple, the 2.0 if fully multithreaded, but that means that
it needs a lot more memory; the scope for
you too huh
GrayHat wrote:
some time-consuming tasks
which ones?
look at the source code :D
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco,
CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest
what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0?
what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2?
what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/New-1.5.2-Beta-tp22038898p22109980.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
what is the point of this if i can have 37 threads with 2.0?
what does thread 1 do in 1.5.2?
what does thread 2 do in 1.5.2?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/New-1.5.2-Beta-tp22038898p22109984.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
yes there is interest!
are you volunteering?
perhaps something like this:
http://www.imgx.org/public/view/full/867
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Graphing-Statistics-tp22026483p22027096.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
but this is what I have so far (somewhat simple
to do, maybe not simple to all ASSP users.)
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: bytehd [mailto:byt...@us.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 13:26
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Graphing Statistics
yes
Has anyone noticed a difference?
Only high-utilization sites or all sites?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Success-of-MT-vs-ST--tp21224749p21224749.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
yea
this is a really big deal
thanks FRitz!!
tanstaafl_bh wrote:
On 12/7/2008 1:15 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP 2 does TLS !
loud applauseawesome - thanks Fritz!/loud applause
--
SF.Net email is
lll try it out
moving up is not an option until stable
Kevin-158 wrote:
Changelog and release notes here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=69172release_id=607988
Even if you are running a newer version of ASSP already I recommend
getting the updated scripts and
Threads 1.69: Perl package or some other lib?
tanstaafl_bh wrote:
On 4/2/2008 7:05 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP 1.3.6 is obsolet
introducing ASSP 2.0.0 (0.0) (multithreaded)
Perl 5.8.8-822 is needed
threads 1.69 is needed
Wow! Someone's been busy! :)
Looks like it may be
what maint tasks are killing ASSP?
can you provide a listing of functions and execution times for a given load?
sorted by time?
(not asking for much huh)
Guess im coming from the great app dev tools you get on the winblows side
to MT, generally you are looking at encapsulating anything that can
Craig
how do I find out the versions of the threading modules that i have?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/a-multi-threaded-assp-tp15723508p15842547.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
yes.
since perl is not multi-threaded
how did you do yours?
C?
the obvious place is to allow multiple simultaneous smtp sessions.
Craig Schmitt wrote:
Is anyone interested in testing a multi-threaded version of assp?
I've been working on converting 1.3.5 to run all of the maintenance
–Dusethreads ?
or activestate?
Kevin-158 wrote:
bytehd wrote:
yes.
since perl is not multi-threaded
how did you do yours?
Perl has has threading since 5.6 and it became stable in 5.8.
It is a little bit different than most threading models however.
Kevin
ok.
So where in Fritz' code do you insert the break point?
or do you run concurrent processes?
will there be a master handler thread that decides ok im realy busy now so
spawn
im not a perl monk, so im not sure of the libraries available
on linux pthreads are used but until 5.8 perl used fork
count me in
Craig Schmitt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: bytehd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So where in Fritz' code do you insert the break point?
or do you run concurrent processes?
will there be a master handler thread that decides ok im realy busy now
so
spawn
im not a perl
Otherwise, this kind of comment is irrelevant coming from a user.
yeah who needs them anyways
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/1.3.6-tp14632303p14649102.html
Sent from the assp-test mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
26 matches
Mail list logo