Re: [Assp-test] My error with Thread::Queue in assp Version 2

2010-05-16 Thread Thomas Eckardt
ad, which is not common. SIG{TERM} should never appear in a SMTPWorker-thread (is unexpected) . Thread::Queue was never the reason - if a Worker is 'sleeping' he sit and waits at line 51 of Thread::Queue. Thomas Von:"admin" An: Datum: 15.05.2010 09:54 Betreff:

Re: [Assp-test] My error with Thread::Queue in assp Version 2

2010-05-15 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
Grayhat schreibt: >To "developer" WHO ? I don't think they're releasing "tickets" >so, maybe you're using some other "fork" of the ASSP ? Unfortunately he sent a bug-report to the developer of Thread::queue because he saw a warning in the ASSP log. -

Re: [Assp-test] My error with Thread::Queue in assp Version 2

2010-05-15 Thread Grayhat
> I have sent a bug-report to to developer from the Thread::queue . > Here the answer from him: [...] > These warning messages are coming from the application. > See lines 39967 through 40018 in assp.pl. It appears these > are just warnings, and that the SIGTERM does trigger the > application

[Assp-test] My error with Thread::Queue in assp Version 2

2010-05-15 Thread admin
I have sent a bug-report to to developer from the Thread::queue . Here the answer from him: -- > Hello, > > I have a problem with Thread-Queue when i send a kill TERM signal to > restart >